Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Bacillus subtilis DSM 33862 and Lentilactobacillus buchneri DSM 12856 as an acidity regulator for all animal species (Lactosan GmbH & Co.KG)
Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto‐Maradona, Ilen Röhe

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the safety and effectiveness of a bacterial feed additive for regulating acidity in animal feed, finding it safe for animals and the environment but potentially harmful to users.
Contribution
The study provides a safety and efficacy assessment of a bacterial feed additive for all animal species, including its impact on pH reduction.
Findings
The additive is safe for target species, consumers, and the environment.
The additive is a skin and respiratory sensitiser, posing risks to users.
The additive can reduce the pH of plant-origin feed materials effectively.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on Bacillus subtilis DSM 33862 and Lentilactobacillus buchneri DSM 12856 when used as a technological additive (acidity regulator) in feed for all animal species. The additive is intended to be incorporated into feed materials of plant origin with high moisture content (dry matter range between 25% and 40%). The bacterial species B. subtilis and L. buchneri are considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. The identification of both strains has been clearly established; they did not show acquired resistance to antibiotics of human and veterinary importance, and B. subtilis DSM 33862 lacks toxigenic potential. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the preparation of B. subtilis DSM 33862 and L. buchneri DSM 12856 is safe for the…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAgricultural safety and regulations · Occupational exposure and asthma · Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
