Image-guided protocol with a guide-marker for bone conduction hearing implant placement estimation

TL;DR

A new image-guided protocol using 3D CT scans and a guide-marker improves the accuracy and safety of bone conduction hearing implant placement.

Contribution

A replicable image-guided protocol combining 3D CT reconstruction and a guide-marker for BCHD implant placement is proposed and validated.

Findings

Relevant anatomical findings were identified in 52.9% of subjects, affecting implant placement in 37.3% of cases.

Moderate agreement was found between reviewers regarding implant placement estimates.

Abstract

•Image-guided implant placement estimation was effective to install BCHI.•The proposed protocol proved to be replicable in clinical practice.•Relevant findings were identified in 52.9% of subjects, impacting implant placement in 37.3% of cases.•The proposed protocol may increase the safety and efficacy of BCHD surgery.

Image-guided implant placement estimation was effective to install BCHI.

The proposed protocol proved to be replicable in clinical practice.

Relevant findings were identified in 52.9% of subjects, impacting implant placement in 37.3% of cases.

The proposed protocol may increase the safety and efficacy of BCHD surgery.

To propose a protocol for image-guided implant placement estimation, combining 3D reconstruction of preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) images and a guide-marker, for individuals undergoing percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices (BCHD).

Fifty-one subjects aged 6- to 75-years undergoing percutaneous BCHD surgery were included. Three optional implant points were estimated and marked using a guide-marker, and compared with preoperative CT images to define optimal placement. A peer validation was conducted by two independent reviewers to assess the replicability of the protocol in clinical practice.

Bilateral CT images were obtained from all 51 subjects, and a total of 54 BCHD surgeries were performed. Relevant findings, including mastoid cells (19.6%), cranial suture lines (27.5%), perforating vessels (13.7%), bone surface irregularities (1.9%), venous lakes (9.8%), and fixation plates (3.9%) were identified in 52.9% of subjects, and they affected the implant placement in 37.3% of cases. There was moderate agreement between the reviewers regarding implant placement in both right and left ears, and in relation to the actual implant placement performed during the surgical procedure.

The image-guided implant placement estimation, combining 3D reconstruction of preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) images and a guide-marker, has proven reliable and effective for estimating optimal implant placement in subjects undergoing percutaneous BCHD surgery, thereby constituting a valuable tool for clinical practice.

2.

Figures