# Efficient recovery and DNA extraction for algae-associated microbial communities

**Authors:** Elizaveta Chevokina, Daria Sibiryakina, Andrey Sobolev, Darya Slonova, Alina Demkina, Daria Yurikova, Alina Galivondzhyan, Olga Konovalova, Dmitry Sutormin, Artem Isaev

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1693747 · Frontiers in Plant Science · 2026-01-05

## TL;DR

This study compares methods to recover and extract DNA from algae-associated microbes, finding that some techniques balance DNA quality and quantity better than others.

## Contribution

The study provides a benchmark of DNA extraction methods for algae-associated microbial communities, identifying the most versatile commercial kit.

## Key findings

- Whole-sample homogenization and manual biofilm collection led to high chloroplast contamination.
- Using a detergent improved DNA yields compared to buffer-only washing.
- The GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit was the most versatile across algal species.

## Abstract

The extraction of high-quality microbial DNA from environmental samples is critical for many downstream applications, including short- and long-read metagenomic sequencing. However, environmental DNA is prone to low recovery, degradation, and contamination by enzymatic inhibitors, with the extent of these issues largely dependent on the DNA purification method. The embedding of bacterial cells in a mucoid matrix within biofilms further complicates the process, making the study of algal symbionts particularly challenging. This study benchmarked five methods to recover microbial cells from biofilms associated with three major groups of marine macroalgae, namely: red (Palmaria stenogona), brown (Saccharina japonica), and green (Ulva lactuca). This was followed by a systematic evaluation of six widely used commercial DNA purification kits for their ability to extract high-quality DNA suitable for 16S rRNA gene and shotgun sequencing. A universal trade-off was observed between the quantity and quality of the extracted DNA. While whole-sample homogenization and manual collection of biofilms resulted in high levels of chloroplast contamination, washing microbial cells with a buffer led to low DNA recovery; however, the use of a detergent improved DNA yields. A comparison of the DNA extraction kits revealed that their efficiency varied significantly among algal species, with the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific) identified as the most versatile. The present findings provide a comparative benchmark of methods to recover algae-associated microbial communities and extract their DNA, offering guidance in selecting procedures suited for metagenomic sequencing.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Palmaria stenogona (taxon 2586434), Saccharina japonica (taxon 88149), Ulva lactuca (taxon 63410)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Saccharina japonica (species) [taxon 88149], Palmaria stenogona (species) [taxon 2586434], Ulva lactuca (species) [taxon 63410], PX clade (clade) [taxon 569578]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12813104/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12813104/full.md

## References

80 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12813104/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12813104