# Mechanical needle guidance for ultrasound-guided parasagittal oblique in-plane paravertebral blocks: a cadaveric study

**Authors:** Hesham Elsharkawy, Ece Yamak Altinpulluk, Tetsuya Shimada, Ilker Ince, Guangmei Mao, Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro, Loran Mounir Soliman, Nair Harsha, Marta Kelava, Richard Drake, Xuan Pu, Daniel I. Sessler, Alparslan Turan

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844716 · 2025-11-28

## TL;DR

A study tested if a mechanical needle guide improves ultrasound visibility during paravertebral blocks but found no significant benefit for novice users.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the effectiveness of a mechanical needle guide in improving ultrasound-guided paravertebral block performance by novices.

## Key findings

- No significant difference in needle tip visibility with or without the mechanical guide.
- No improvement in procedural time or difficulty scores when using the guide.
- Subjective ease-of-use ratings did not favor the guided method.

## Abstract

Paravertebral blocks provide analgesia for a range of thoracoabdominal surgeries. However, visualizing the needle tip during the procedure can be challenging, especially for clinicians with limited experience, because the target is deep. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that needle guidance by the Infiniti Plus system improves ultrasound visualization of the needle tip during thoracic paravertebral blocks performed by novice residents.

Nineteen clinical anesthesia residents each performed 20 bilateral ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blocks (T2–T11) on 17 unembalmed cadavers, with and without the use of a fixed-angle mechanical needle guide in a randomized crossover design. The primary outcome, percent perfect needle visibility, was compared between guided and unguided methods using a paired t-test. Secondary outcomes, including time to needle visualization, number of needle insertion attempts, and subjective ease-of-use ratings, were analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, respectively. Inter-rater reliability for overall perception ratings was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).

There were no significant differences in needle-target visualization (62% ± 17% with guidance vs. 64% ± 18% without, p = 0.15), time to target (HR = 1.00 [95% CI 0.86–1.16], p = 0.99), procedural difficulty scores, or number of insertion attempts between guided and unguided blocks.

The Infiniti Plus mechanical needle guide did not demonstrate improved ultrasound needle tip visualization during thoracic paravertebral blocks performed by novice clinicians in cadavers.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CA-2 (MESH:D020803), CA-1 (MESH:C538557), dehydration (MESH:D003681), bleeding (MESH:D006470), block (MESH:D006327), , or visceral injury (MESH:D007418), thoracic cavity disease (MESH:D013896)
- **Chemicals:** saline (MESH:D012965)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12811454/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12811454