Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan for the Vasopressin for Septic Shock Pragmatic (VASSPR) Cluster-Crossover Randomized Trial
Ithan D. Peltan, Danielle Groat, Jason R. Jacobs, Elisabeth H. Tillman, Ben J. Brintz, Stephanie Chauv, Sarah J. Beesley, Jennifer H. Edwards, Natalia Arizmendez, Eliotte L. Hirshberg, Jason R. Carr, Michael J. Lanspa, Joseph R. Bledsoe, Austin T. Smith, Harmony Schneider

TL;DR
This paper outlines a clinical trial to determine whether starting vasopressin at a lower or higher threshold improves survival in septic shock patients.
Contribution
The study introduces a pragmatic cluster-crossover trial design to compare vasopressin initiation thresholds in septic shock treatment.
Findings
The trial compares vasopressin initiation at 0.1 vs. 0.4 mg/kg/min norepinephrine equivalents.
The primary outcome is 28-day all-cause mortality in septic shock patients.
The protocol and statistical analysis plan are prespecified to ensure rigorous trial conduct.
Abstract
Guidelines recommend vasopressin as the preferred second-line vasopressor for treatment of septic shock. However, the optimal threshold for vasopressin initiation is unclear. Does a treatment strategy using a lower or a higher threshold for initiation of vasopressin as a secondary vasopressor decrease the incidence of 28-day mortality for patients with septic shock? The Vasopressin for Septic Shock Pragmatic (VASSPR) trial is a multicenter, open-label, cluster-randomized, multiple cluster-crossover pragmatic clinical trial being conducted in 13 hospitals in Utah and Idaho. The trial compares a strategy for septic shock management recommending initiation of fixed-dose vasopressin as a secondary vasopressor at a lower threshold (when the total dose of other vasopressors reaches 0.1 mg/kg/min norepinephrine equivalents [NEEs]) to a strategy initiating vasopressin at a higher threshold…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
