In their own words: A qualitative examination of student experiences with high-impact practices during the second-year transition
Austin L. Zuckerman, Gregory J. Stocker, Cheyenne N. Mercer, Randy G. Tsai, Thomas J. Bussey, Stanley M. Lo, Ahmed El-Sayed, Ahmed El-Sayed, Ahmed El-Sayed, Ahmed El-Sayed

TL;DR
This study explores how second-year college students experience high-impact educational practices through their own words, focusing on academic, social, personal, and professional development.
Contribution
The study adds student perspectives on high-impact practices using qualitative methods, focusing on second-year students and their transition experiences.
Findings
Students reported significant academic, social, and personal benefits from high-impact practices.
Professional development outcomes were less emphasized and detailed compared to other areas.
Student reflections revealed the importance of aligning activities with meaningful educational experiences.
Abstract
Researchers and practitioners have called for the use of high-impact practices to support student engagement and development in higher education institutions in the United States. Many studies have used quantitative methods to validate the importance of these practices in supporting broad academic and social outcomes, but fewer have used qualitative approaches to understand the range of outcomes that students perceive they are obtaining from these experiences. The development and evaluation of high-impact practices cannot be fully realized without leveraging student voices to understand the range of potential benefits that students acquire. Identifying practices that students perceive as valuable to their learning is essential for cultivating meaningful experiences that support student development and improve affective dispositions toward educational experiences. Second-year students…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigher Education Research Studies · Higher Education Practises and Engagement · Evaluation of Teaching Practices
