# Skeletal Muscle Mass Modifies the Prognostic Impact of LDL Cholesterol in Chronic Heart Failure

**Authors:** Ryosuke Sato, Tania Garfias‐Veitl, Guglielmo Fibbi, Mirela Vatic, Wolfram Doehner, Stefan D. Anker, Stephan von Haehling

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.70168 · Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle · 2026-01-16

## TL;DR

Low LDL cholesterol levels are linked to higher mortality in heart failure patients, especially those with low muscle mass, suggesting a connection between cholesterol and muscle health.

## Contribution

This study reveals that LDL cholesterol's prognostic impact in heart failure depends on skeletal muscle mass, introducing a new perspective on lipid-muscle interplay.

## Key findings

- Lower LDL-C levels were associated with higher mortality in chronic heart failure patients.
- The negative impact of low LDL-C was more pronounced in patients with low skeletal muscle mass.
- Lipid-modulating strategies may help reduce muscle wasting and improve outcomes in heart failure.

## Abstract

Dyslipidaemia is among the major risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Paradoxically, higher cholesterol levels are associated with better survival in heart failure (HF) of any aetiology. Because cholesterol is an integral component of skeletal muscle structure, one possible explanation involves the interplay between lipid metabolism and skeletal muscle health. Using data from the Studies Investigating Comorbidities Aggravating Heart Failure, we investigated whether an association exists between low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) levels and all‐cause mortality in patients with chronic HF in the context of skeletal muscle mass.

A total of 241 patients with chronic HF (68 ± 11 years, 80% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 39% ± 13%) were enrolled. LDL‐C levels were divided into low and high based on the median value (93 mg/dL). The appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) was assessed using a dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry scan and divided into high and low based on the sex‐specific median value (men = 7.97 kg/m2, women = 6.87 kg/m2). Patients were divided into four groups based on median LDL‐C levels and ASMI values.

During a median follow‐up of 6.3 years, 95 patients (39%) died. There were differences in mortality between the four groups, with the highest mortality in patients with low LDL‐C levels and low ASMI and the lowest mortality in patients with high LDL‐C levels and high ASMI (p = 0.002, by log‐rank). The low LDL‐C group had higher mortality compared with the high LDL‐C group (46% vs. 33%, p = 0.01, by log‐rank). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis confirmed the association between the low LDL‐C group and higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.65 [1.00–2.72], p = 0.04). This prognostic impact of low LDL‐C appeared greater in the low ASMI group than in the high ASMI group (56% vs. 37%, p = 0.01, and 36% vs. 28%, p = 0.28, by log‐rank: p for interaction = 0.47). In the low ASMI group, lower LDL‐C levels were predictors of mortality in multivariate Cox proportional hazard models (aHR 1.46–1.48 per 1 SD decrease in LDL‐C, all p < 0.05).

In patients with chronic HF, lower LDL‐C levels were associated with higher mortality, especially in the low ASMI group. These findings suggest that low cholesterol levels may exacerbate skeletal muscle loss, potentially creating a vicious cycle that worsens patient outcomes. Lipid‐modulating strategies could help mitigate muscle wasting in HF.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** cholesterol (PubChem CID 5997)
- **Diseases:** heart failure (MONDO:0005252), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (MONDO:1060134)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (MESH:D050197), HF (MESH:D006333), muscle wasting (MESH:D009133), muscle loss (MESH:D009135)
- **Chemicals:** cholesterol (MESH:D002784), Lipid (MESH:D008055)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12809719/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12809719/full.md

## References

57 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12809719/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12809719