# ICSH Recommendations for Monocyte Cell Lineage Morphologic Identification, Nomenclature Harmonization, and Utilization as a Biomarker

**Authors:** Gina Zini, Yoon Hwan Chang, Giuseppe d'Onofrio, John Frater, Ulrich Germing, Anna Merino, Olga Pozdnyakova, David Ross, Claudio Romulo Siqueira Filho, Akiyoshi Takami, Erber Wendy

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.70029 · International Journal of Laboratory Hematology · 2025-11-26

## TL;DR

This paper presents standardized guidelines for identifying and classifying monocytes to improve diagnostic accuracy and support AI-driven tools in hematology.

## Contribution

The paper introduces harmonized morphological definitions and nomenclature for monocyte lineage cells to enhance diagnostic reproducibility.

## Key findings

- A three-category morphological classification for monocytes is proposed: blasts, immature monocytes, and mature monocytes.
- Monocyte-related parameters like MDW, LMR, and NMR are recognized as useful biomarkers for clinical use.
- Standardized methods combining morphology, cytochemistry, and flow cytometry are recommended for accurate diagnosis.

## Abstract

Monocytes are key components of the Mononuclear Phagocyte System, crucial in immune defense, inflammation, and tissue repair. Accurate identification and classification of monocyte lineage cells are essential for diagnosing both reactive and clonal hematologic disorders. However, morphological criteria and nomenclature inconsistencies have hindered reproducibility, particularly with the rise of automated and AI‐driven diagnostic tools. The International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Monocyte Working Group (MWG) was convened to establish standardized morphological definitions, harmonize nomenclature for monocytes and their precursors, and evaluate their clinical utility as biomarkers. Data were collected from global laboratories, combined with an extensive literature review and consensus feedback from the ICSH General Assembly. The MWG proposes a three‐category morphological classification: blasts and blast equivalents (monoblasts and promonocytes), immature monocytes, and mature monocytes. The recommendations reaffirm the importance of morphological analysis, cytochemical staining, and flow cytometry for accurate diagnosis. Emerging automated parameters, such as monocyte distribution width (MDW), and ratios like lymphocyte/monocyte (LMR) and neutrophil/monocyte (NMR), are also recognized as valuable adjunctive biomarkers. Cytogenetic and molecular results may also impact the utilization of monocytes as a biomarker. These harmonized recommendations aim to improve diagnostic accuracy, support the development of machine learning tools, and facilitate consistent reporting across laboratories worldwide.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** hematologic disorders (MESH:D006402), inflammation (MESH:D007249)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12809381/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12809381/full.md

## References

77 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12809381/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12809381