Correction: Fabricating high-purity graphite disk electrodes as a cost-effective alternative in fundamental electrochemistry research
Claudia Spallacci, Mikaela Görlin, Amol Kumar, Luca D’Amario, Mun Hon Cheah
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectrochemical Analysis and Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-024-54654-0, published online 21 February 2024.
The original version of this Article contained errors in the Results and discussion section, under the subheading ‘Electron transfer properties’.
“Knowing the diffusion coefficients of the redox probes (for anodic current in aqueous solution, respectively 6.4 × 10^6^ cm^2^/s for ferricyanide and 7.86 × 10^6^ cm^2^/s for ruthenium(II) hexamine)^16^, it is possible to obtain values of EASA (Table 1, Figs. S9–S10).”
now reads:
“Knowing the diffusion coefficients of the redox probes (for anodic current in aqueous solution, respectively 6.4 x 10^−6^ cm^2^/s for ferricyanide and 7.86 x 10^−6^ cm^2^/s for ruthenium(II) hexamine)^16^, it is possible to obtain values of EASA (Table 1, Figs. S9–S10).”
The original Article has been corrected.