# Access Improvement in Healthcare: Be Quick, but Don't Hurry?

**Authors:** Allen M. Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.70052 · Learning Health Systems · 2025-12-05

## TL;DR

This paper reviews strategies for improving healthcare access without introducing new inefficiencies, emphasizing careful planning and balance.

## Contribution

A novel conceptual framework for access improvement focusing on strategic alignment, execution, and adaptation.

## Key findings

- Access improvement is critical for eliminating inefficiencies in healthcare delivery.
- Hastening access initiatives can lead to new bureaucratic challenges.
- A balanced approach combining speed, purpose, and precision is essential for success.

## Abstract

Access improvement is a fundamental component of value‐based healthcare as it inherently promotes quality by eliminating chokepoints, redundancies, and inefficiencies that could hinder the provisioning of timely care. Yet as healthcare organizations struggle with cost containment, the question of how to most effectively enhance access remains largely unsolved. Given the economic, regulatory, and social forces across the healthcare marketplace, the critical importance of access in optimizing efficiency is increasingly being recognized. The purpose of this review is to thus present a practical framework that offers healthcare organizations an actionable, thematic‐based foundation for approaching access improvement.

An interpretive synthesis of health access as it relates to the timely, satisfactory, and sustainable receipt of services was presented while addressing operational constraints, inclusivity and underlying determinants of health. The criticality of this concept, spanning the entire healthcare continuum and encompassing all aspects of care delivery, from making an initial appointment to completing treatment and being followed thereafter, was evaluated. Empirical lessons were highlighted for discussion.

Given the sense of urgency that exists around this issue, the potential pitfalls of “hurrying” to initiate access improvement are frequently overlooked by health systems. Considerations related to workforce shortages, resource limitations, logistical coordination, workflow processes, space capacity, provider availability, and organizational culture and hierarchy, among others, need to be methodically addressed so as not to introduce new inefficiencies into a healthcare environment that is already viewed by many as overly bureaucratic. Based on the core themes that emerged, a conceptual framework for access improvement centered on strategy, alignment, execution, adaptation, and reflection was developed.

The design, planning, and operationalization of access improvement initiatives in healthcare require meticulous organizational preparation and a deliberate leadership approach incorporating principles of change management. Success will be dependent on achieving the appropriate balance between speed, purpose, and precision.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MESH:D001007), cancer (MESH:D009369), toxicity (MESH:D064420), burnout (MESH:D002055), depression (MESH:D003866)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12805807/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12805807/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12805807/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12805807