Determinants of survival after re-resection for recurrent glioblastoma: a meta-analysis
Manuel V. Baby, Rithvik M. Narendranath, Symriti Kaur-Paneser, Daniele S. C. Ramsay, Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah, Srikar R. Namireddy, Ahmed Salih, Ahkash Thavarajasingam, Daniel Scurtu, Andreas Kramer, Veit Stöcklein, Darius Kalasauskas, Dragan Jankovic, Florian Ringel

TL;DR
This study identifies factors affecting survival after re-surgery for recurring glioblastoma, finding that complete tumor removal and MGMT gene methylation are linked to better outcomes.
Contribution
The study provides a meta-analysis of prognostic factors for survival after re-resection in recurrent glioblastoma, highlighting the importance of gross total resection and MGMT promoter methylation.
Findings
Gross total resection and methylated MGMT promoter status are strongly associated with improved survival.
Age and preoperative KPS < 70 are modestly associated with worse survival.
Adjuvant chemotherapy and timing of re-resection show inconsistent survival benefits.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) inevitably recurs despite maximal safe resection and standard chemoradiotherapy. The factors influencing survival after first recurrence and re-resection remain controversial. What are the prognostic factors influencing survival following re-resection of glioblastoma? A systematic search of major databases was conducted for original studies reporting on survival outcomes. Data on hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival and key prognostic factors were extracted, followed by meta-analyses of univariate and multivariate Cox models. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed. A total of 30 studies were included. Gross total resection and methylated MGMT promoter status were significantly associated with improved survival, with pooled HRs of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.36–0.76, p < 0.001) and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, age was modestly…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment · Brain Metastases and Treatment · Meningioma and schwannoma management
