# Systematic review of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices in murine thigh and hollow fibre dose fractionation studies analysed with a standard method

**Authors:** Najla Alabdulkarim, John Readman, Andrew Mead, Robert Oakley, Suzanne Wenker, Japhette Kembou, Stefano Azzariti, Mona Bajaj-Elliott, Mario Cortina-Borja, Joseph F Standing

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaf446 · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2025-12-17

## TL;DR

This study reviews and standardizes methods for determining antibiotic dosing using pre-clinical models.

## Contribution

The paper proposes a standardized approach for PKPD index model selection using AIC and Emax models.

## Key findings

- Only one of 53 studies used AIC for model selection.
- Reanalysis showed disagreement in optimal PKPD indices in six studies.
- Too few HFIM studies exist to compare PKPD indices with MTIM.

## Abstract

Pre-clinical models are commonly used to determine human antibiotic dosage regimens using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) indices. The murine thigh infection model (MTIM) is most commonly used for PKPD index determination, while the hollow fibre infection model (HFIM) may be a viable alternative. However, there is no standardized method for determining the PKPD index and R2 may not be the ideal metric to determine goodness of fit for nonlinear models. This study aimed to reanalyse PKPD indices published in MTIM and HFIM, using a standardized modelling approach.

Systematic literature review was conducted to identify MTIM and HFIM dose fractionation studies. Searches covered databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, SCOPUS and EMBASE. Data were extracted and modelled using eight variations of Emax model, with model selection based on the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) and parameter plausibility in terms of precision and interpretability.

A total of 53 studies were included: 50 MTIM (of 1138) and 3 HFIM (of 316). Among the 53 studies, reporting issues included an infrequent use of AIC for model selection as applied in only one paper, and a lack of methodological transparency in 29 papers. Remodelling revealed some disagreement in optimal PKPD indices in six studies.

This study suggests a standard method for PKPD index model selection and provides a database on PKPD index analysis. Building the Emax model from one to four estimated parameters and assessing them with AIC is recommended to avoid over fitting. Too few HFIM dose fractionation studies were found to allow comparison of PKPD index with MTIM.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Mus musculus (taxon 10090)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infection (MESH:D007239)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12802965/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12802965/full.md

## References

84 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12802965/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12802965