Efficacy of eravacycline in difficult-to-treat (DTR) Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemia in ICU: a case report
Monica Melchio, Federica Portunato, Antonio Vena, Elisa Porcile, Monica Centanaro, Matteo Bassetti

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria · Vibrio bacteria research studies · Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Acinetobacter baumannii is a Gram-negative pathogen responsible for nosocomial infections associated with high mortality rates, primarily due to the development of multiple resistance mechanisms against most antibiotics. In ICUs, the overall mortality rate can reach up to 54% in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), bacteraemia and septic shock.^1^
Traditionally, treatment options for DTR A. baumannii infections have been suboptimal, often involving combination regimens that include high doses of ampicillin–sulbactam, carbapenems, colistin or tigecycline. However, these regimens have been associated with high rates of renal and hepatic toxicity as well as subtherapeutic concentrations at the infection site.^2^
In recent years, new antimicrobial agents with improved tolerability with activity against A. baumannii have been approved, including cefiderocol, eravacycline and durlobactam/sulbactam.^3^ However, the latter is not yet available in Europe.
Here, we report a case of DTR A. baumannii bacteraemia successfully managed with eravacycline monotherapy.
At the end of 2024, a male patient in his forties was transferred from a secondary hospital to the ICU of our university hospital in Northern Italy due to haemorrhagic shock and respiratory failure, requiring endotracheal intubation. His past medical history included obesity (BMI 34), diabetes and recent hospitalization for haematemesis secondary to oesophageal varices, which led to the diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis cirrhosis.
On admission, rectal swab screening revealed colonization by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (OXA-23 producer).
His respiratory status rapidly worsened, and chest CT demonstrated bilateral consolidative pneumonia. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed, and rapid molecular test identified the presence of A. baumannii, confirmed by conventional culture. Susceptibility results are shown in Table 1.
In accordance with current IDSA guidelines, VAP treatment was initiated with ampicillin–sulbactam (27 g/24 h) and cefiderocol (2 g every 6 h—extended infusion), dosed for his glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 123 mL/min.^3^ After 6 days with limited improvement, colistin was added (loading dose 9 million IU, then 4.5 million IU every 12 h), leading to gradual clinical recovery.
Following 17 days of therapy, antibiotics were discontinued. With optimized haemodynamic status through fluid balance reduction, the patient remained stable for nearly 2 weeks.
He then developed new-onset fever and haemodynamic deterioration. Blood cultures were performed, and one of four blood culture bottles turned positive within 2 h. Rapid molecular testing identified A. baumannii, prompting re-initiation of ampicillin–sulbactam (27 g/24 h) and cefiderocol (2 g every 8 h; GFR 65 mL/min). Conventional cultures confirmed the isolate in blood, and the same pathogen was also recovered from broncho-aspirate (Table 1).
Given the recent antibiotic exposure and updated susceptibility profile—showing a reduced inhibition zone diameter for cefiderocol—eravacycline susceptibility testing was performed, yielding a MIC of 0.25 mg/L. After 48 h of combination therapy with ampicillin–sulbactam and cefiderocol, haemodynamic stability was achieved, and treatment was switched to eravacycline monotherapy (1 mg/kg every 12 h). No dose adjustment was made, as he had moderate hepatic impairment (Child–Pugh Class B), and current literature does not consistently recommend dose reduction in this setting.^4^ A blood culture obtained 24 h after the initiation of eravacycline was negative, and clearance of bacteraemia was confirmed by two additional blood culture sets performed at 48 and 72 h of therapy. Eravacycline was continued for a total of 7 days, leading to fever resolution and clinical improvement.
Over the following 3 weeks, his condition steadily improved, allowing transfer to a rehabilitation unit and, after a further month, the patient was discharged home. At 6-month follow-up, he remained in good health and continued regular outpatient monitoring for his liver disease.
Our case demonstrates successful clinical and microbiological cure of DTR A. baumannii bacteraemia with eravacycline monotherapy in a critically ill patient.
Eravacycline is a next-generation tetracycline characterized by a favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.^5^ Although in vitro studies suggest activity against A. baumannii,^6^ real-world data remain limited, and published results have been conflicting.^7–11^
A few retrospective non-controlled studies have reported encouraging outcomes, with clinical cure rates ranging from 70% to 95%, including cases involving A. baumannii infections.^7–9,11^ Nonetheless, the small sample sizes, limited susceptibility data and variability in the use of monotherapy versus combination regimens complicate the interpretation of these real-life experiences.
Worth mentioning is the cohort study by Scott et al.,^10^ which compared eravacycline (used as part of a combination regimen in 70% of cases) with the previously best available therapy for DTR A. baumannii pneumonia. In this study, the eravacycline group exhibited a higher 30-day mortality rate than controls (33% versus 15%, P = 0.048), with particularly poor outcomes observed in the four patients treated with eravacycline with A. baumannii bacteraemia.
In contrast to the findings of Scott et al., our case shows that eravacycline monotherapy can achieve both clinical and microbiological cure in selected patients with DTR A. baumannii bacteraemia. While a single case cannot provide definitive evidence, it offers valuable real-world insight into a possible therapeutic option. Further well-designed studies with larger patient populations are needed to clearly define eravacycline’s role, particularly in bacteraemic presentations.
The patient was informed about the conduct and publication of this case study and provided written and verbal informed consent. The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Fournier PE, Richet H. The epidemiology and control of Acinetobacter baumannii in health care facilities. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42: 692–9. 10.1086/50020216447117 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Bassetti M, Labate L, Russo C et al Therapeutic options for difficult-to-treat Acinetobacter baumannii infections: a 2020 perspective. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22: 167–77. 10.1080/14656566.2020.181738632915685 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Tamma PD, Heil EL, Justo JA et al Infectious Diseases Society of America 2024 guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative infections. Clin Infect Dis 2024: ciae 403. 10.1093/cid/ciae 40339108079 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Horn P, Redican S, Olesky M. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of eravacycline in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017; 4: S 521–2. 10.1093/ofid/ofx 163.1359 · doi ↗
- 5Zhanel GG, Cheung D, Adam H et al Review of eravacycline, a novel fluorocycline antibacterial agent. Drugs 2016; 76: 567–88. 10.1007/s 40265-016-0545-826863149 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Ataman M, Çelik BÖ. Investigation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of eravacycline alone and in combination with various antibiotics against MDR Acinetobacter baumanni strains. BMC Microbiol 2025; 25: 167. 10.1186/s 12866-025-03914-840133833 PMC 11938564 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Alosaimy S, Morrisette T, Lagnf AM et al Clinical outcomes of eravacycline in patients treated predominately for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10: e 0047922. 10.1128/spectrum.00479-2236190427 PMC 9602915 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Hobbs ALV, Gelfand MS, Cleveland KO et al A retrospective, multicentre evaluation of eravacycline utilisation in community and academic hospitals. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2022; 29: 430–3. 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.02034788691 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
