Correction: Assessing the Validity and Impact of Remote Digital Image Reading in Fungal Diagnostics
Vilhelmina Lundgren, Özlem Dogan, Anna Ekwall-Larson, Christine Stenström, Erja Chryssanthou, Maria Guglielmeti, Ylva Närström, Patrik Dinnétz, Silvia Botero-Kleiven, Volkan Özenci
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCell Image Analysis Techniques · AI in cancer detection · Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Correction to: Mycopathologia (2025) 190:114 10.1007/s11046-025-01012-x
In the original publication of this article, Fig. 6 appeared in an incomplete form. This has now been corrected in the online publication. For completeness and transparency, the correct and old incorrect versions are displayed below.
The original article has been corrected.
Incorrect Fig. 6Fig. 6. Correct decision rate (%) for individual participant for each image group. Error bars indicate 95% CI. The interaction between participant and digital image group as non-significant (p = 0.118, glm)
Correct Fig. 6Fig. 6. Correct decision rate (%) for individual participant for each image group. Error bars indicate 95% CI. The interaction between participant and digital image group as non-significant (p = 0.118, glm)