# Print, Play, and Learn: Cataloging Card and Board Games for Medical Education From 1980 to 2025

## TL;DR

This paper catalogs medical education card and board games from 1980 to 2025, showing a rise in availability due to new distribution technologies.

## Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive catalog of medical education games beyond existing literature, highlighting trends in content and distribution.

## Key findings

- 224 games were identified, with 87 meeting inclusion criteria for medical education.
- Print-on-demand and printable files are common distribution methods for these games.
- Only 36% of games have an associated academic publication.

## Abstract

Background

Card and board games are increasingly described in the medical education literature, but games in the literature are not always available for use by educators. Since the last survey of games for medical education, new funding and distribution technologies have reduced barriers to sharing games, and we hypothesize that more games are available than described in the literature and that new technologies have contributed to this availability. We aim to describe the current landscape of games beyond the literature to facilitate their use and study.

Methods

For this study, we curated a list of sites where games are available for download and/or purchase by searching for sites associated with the games from an earlier review. We searched these sites over a three-year period to build a catalog of games published in or before 2024 that were designed for physicians and/or physician-track learners. We described the audiences, content areas, technologies used for distribution, and other details about the games.

Results

We identified 224 games, of which 87 met the inclusion criteria. The number of games increased year-over-year from 2013-2019, and the peak year was 2023. Popular game topics included infectious disease (n=15), anatomy (n=11), neurology (n=10), pediatrics (n=10), and emergency medicine (n=9). Games were often shared using printable files (34) and print-on-demand services (23). Only 31 (36%) games had an associated academic publication.

Conclusions

The number of medical education games has substantially increased in the last decade, facilitated by the adoption of print-on-demand and the sharing of printable files. Gaps in content area and target audience still remain, and we encourage educators to employ funding and distribution technologies to facilitate sharing games more widely.