Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Point of Care High‐Sensitivity Troponin Assay in the Prehospital Environment
John Gilman, Abdulrhman Alghamdi, Mark Hann, Edward Carlton, Jamie G. Cooper, Eloïse Cook, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, John Phillips, Alexander Thompson, Steve Bell, Kim Kirby, Andy Rosser, Richard Body

TL;DR
A new point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin test was evaluated for diagnosing heart attacks in prehospital settings, showing high sensitivity but low specificity.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin assay for prehospital AMI diagnosis and evaluates its accuracy with decision aids.
Findings
The POC hs-cTn assay achieved 100% sensitivity at the limit of detection but only 4.6% specificity.
Using the T-MACS decision aid identified 19.7% of patients as very low risk with high sensitivity and NPV.
An exploratory analysis showed 98.9% sensitivity and 99.7% NPV at a 5 ng/L threshold without a decision aid.
Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel point of care (POC) high‐sensitivity troponin (hs‐cTn) assay, used alone or incorporated within validated decision aids, for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the prehospital setting. A pre‐specified secondary analysis of the Prehospital Evaluation of Sensitive Troponin (PRESTO) prospective diagnostic accuracy study, conducted in four ambulance services and 12 Emergency Departments (EDs; February 2019–March 2020). Paramedics included consenting adults with suspected AMI and no other reason for conveyance. Clinical data and venous blood were collected at the scene, and samples conveyed to hospital with participants. Plasma samples were later analyzed for hs‐cTn using a novel POC hs‐cTn assay (Abbott Point of Care i‐STAT hs‐TnI). The target condition was an adjudicated index diagnosis of type 1 AMI. Of 817 consenting participants, 704…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research · Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
