COVID-19 vaccine attitudes among mental health professionals in the WHO’s global clinical practice network
Cary S. Kogan, Dan J. Stein, José A. Garcia-Pacheco, Tahilia J. Rebello, Madeline I. Montoya, Rebeca Robles, Brigitte Khoury, Maya Kulygina, Chihiro Matsumoto, Jingjing Huang, María Elena Medina-Mora, Oye Gureje, Pratap Sharan, Wolfgang Gaebel, Shigenobu Kanba, Howard F. Andrews

TL;DR
This study explores how mental health professionals globally feel about the COVID-19 vaccine and what factors influence their attitudes.
Contribution
The study introduces and validates a new questionnaire to assess mental health professionals' attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine.
Findings
The C-VAQ showed good reliability and validity for measuring vaccine attitudes.
Vaccination status, country mortality rate, and strict pandemic policies were linked to more positive attitudes.
Younger age and lower-income countries were associated with less positive vaccine attitudes.
Abstract
Although COVID-19 vaccines have demonstrated efficacy, there is variability in health professionals’ attitudes towards these agents. Factors associated with mental health professionals’ attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination are not well understood. We investigated these factors by administering a newly developed measure, the COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes Questionnaire (C-VAQ), to members of the World Health Organization’s Global Clinical Practice Network (GCPN) of mental health professionals. 1,931 GCPN members representing all world regions participated between July 28 and September 7, 2021. Mental health professionals’ attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination were assessed in one of five languages (Chinese, English, French, Japanese, Russian, or Spanish) using the C-VAQ. Internal consistency, factor structure, and predictive validity of the C-VAQ were examined, and a multiple-linear…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
