Soil microbial community differences drive variation in Pinus sylvestris physiology, productivity, and responses to elevated CO2
Mark A. Anthony, Nora Röckel, Alexandra Traistaru, Aswin Krishna, Henning Meesenburg, Markus Wagner, Frank Jacob, Arthur Gessler, Peter Waldner, Marcus Schaub, Marco Ferretti, Andreas Schmitz, Pim van den Bulk, Arjan Hensen, Stefan F. Hupperts, Lalasia Bialic-Murphy

TL;DR
Soil microbes significantly influence pine tree growth and how they respond to higher CO2 levels, more than the CO2 itself.
Contribution
Demonstrates that soil microbial community variation has a stronger impact on plant productivity than elevated CO2.
Findings
Seedling productivity under eCO2 was supported by improved photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency with living soil inoculant.
Soil inoculant source influenced plant productivity, linked to increased bacterial species richness and specific beneficial bacteria.
Variation in nitrogen cycling under eCO2 correlated with reduced photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency.
Abstract
Soil microbial communities can affect plant nutrient uptake, productivity, and may even confer resistance to global change. Elevated atmospheric CO2 is widely expected to stimulate plant productivity; however, this will depend on the availability of growth limiting nutrients such as nitrogen. Soil microbial communities are the main mediators of soil nitrogen cycling and should therefore play a key role in influencing plant responses to elevated CO2. To test this, we conducted a controlled, growth chamber experiment with Pinus sylvestris to evaluate how soil microbiome variation influences plant physiology, productivity, and responses to elevated CO₂ (eCO₂; 800 ppm versus 400 ppm in the ambient treatment). Field soils were collected from six forests with varying tree growth rates and were used as an inoculant source, either sterilized or living, into a common growth medium seeded with…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPlant responses to elevated CO2 · Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
