The moment of youth: learning from youth-led research on sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in Malawian and Zambian settings

TL;DR

This paper discusses lessons learned from a youth-led study on sexual and reproductive health in Malawi and Zambia, showing how involving young people improves research quality and relevance.

Contribution

The paper presents five practical lessons for implementing youth-led research in sexual and reproductive health in Global South contexts.

Findings

Youth-led research improves the quality and relevance of findings by involving young people in all stages.

Mentoring and time for knowledge exchange are critical but often underestimated in youth-led research.

Support from established institutions is essential for the success of youth-led research initiatives.

Abstract

Research about young people in lower- and middle-income countries is seldom done by young people themselves. Engaging youth in designing and conducting research that concerns their well-being can improve their skills and make the findings more relevant to young people’s needs. This commentary outlines five lessons learned in the process of conducting a youth-led research study in Malawi and Zambia on youth sexual and reproductive health and rights for the Break Free! programme. Reflections on the challenges and successes encountered by the research team during this study were documented via notes. A reference group of youth advocates was set up to guide the study, and an evaluation was conducted with them about their experience. Data from both these sources were thematically organised and discussed between the research team.

The commentary outlined that meaningfully involving youth in the study methods, not only as participants but also with a youth-led research team and a youth reference group enhanced the quality of study findings. The combination of seasoned youth researchers working with emerging youth researchers from prior collaborations laid a good foundation to implement the study and was identified as a success factor. Fostering a positive working culture that centred peer-to-peer support and the expertise of researchers in and from the ‘Global South’ was a key success in having a fair partnership that shifted power. However, time taken for mentoring, and knowledge exchange, between youth researchers and with the youth reference group was under-estimated and under-budgeted and an adaptable approach to time and resources allowed the research team to address these challenges. Lastly, the support of an established institution was instrumental in the conceptualization and execution of the study and functioned as a pre-condition for success.

The lessons outlined in the commentary highlights the added value of engaging youth in all stages of the research cycle and can offer food for thought for future researchers looking to adopt this approach. While youth-led research may not be suited to every context, its principles of equity and participation can transform both the young participants and the research process.