Nationwide trends and disparities in deaths following cardiogenic shock and sepsis in the United States (1999–2023): insights from the CDC WONDER database
Nafila Zeeshan, Areej Iftikhar, Laiba Sultan, Sahar Ahsan, Amna Parvez, Muhammad Ali, Hamayel Qadir, Rumman Javed, Shahreena Athar Siddiqui, Kamil Ahmad Kamil

TL;DR
This study examines rising deaths from cardiogenic shock and sepsis in the U.S. from 1999 to 2023, revealing significant increases and disparities by age, race, and geography.
Contribution
The study provides the first nationwide analysis of mortality trends and disparities in cardiogenic shock with sepsis using CDC WONDER data.
Findings
Mortality from cardiogenic shock with sepsis increased significantly, with an overall average annual percent change of 5.39%.
Disparities were observed, with higher mortality rates among males, Black or African American individuals, and older adults.
Non-metropolitan areas and certain states showed higher mortality rates compared to others.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) with sepsis is a highly fatal condition, yet national mortality trends and demographic disparities in these co-occurring conditions remain poorly characterized. We analyzed CDC WONDER Multiple Cause of Death data (1999–2023) to identify adult deaths involving both CS and sepsis. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs), crude mortality rates (CMRs), average annual percent change (AAPC), and annual percent change (APC) by period were calculated and stratified by sex, race, age, census region, urbanization, and state. From 1999 to 2023, 59,898 deaths were recorded, overwhelmingly in inpatient medical facilities (94.61%). The national AAMR rose from 0.65 (1999) to 2.01 (2023), with an overall AAPC of 5.39 (95% CI: 4.24–6.56, p < 0.001). Mortality was higher in males (AAMR: 1.28; AAPC: 5.20) compared to females (AAMR: 0.78; AAPC: 5.35). NH Black or African American…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices · Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
