# A qualitative study exploring Malaysian women’s preferences for authority or emotional appeals in public health messages promoting breast cancer screening

**Authors:** Nicholas Yee Liang Hing, Pei Xuan Kuan, Emma Mirza Wati Mohamad, Ching Ee Loo, Komathi Perialathan, Aimi Nadiah Mohamad Norzlen, Yan Yee Yip, Wan Mohd Shariffuddin Zainudin, Shazimah Abdul Samad, Zakiah Mohd Said, Wen Yea Hwong

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-31687-7 · Scientific Reports · 2026-01-12

## TL;DR

This study explores how Malaysian women respond to different types of persuasive messages promoting breast cancer screening.

## Contribution

The study identifies which emotional and authority-based appeals are most effective for promoting breast cancer screening among Malaysian women.

## Key findings

- Messages with hope, authority, or fear appeals were most preferred by participants.
- Humour, sadness, and shame-guilt appeals were generally disliked due to negative or weakening effects.
- Authority appeals were valued for their personalized and authoritative tone.

## Abstract

Persuasive health communication is key to promoting breast cancer screening. Due to existing gaps over how public health messages should be framed, a study was conducted to explore the preferences and perceptions of Malaysian women towards messages that incorporate different types of appeals to promote breast cancer screening. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted among Malaysian women aged 40 and above with no previous history of breast cancer or other cancers. They were exposed to messages that promoted breast cancer screening using seven different appeals; authority, hope, social, humour, fear, sadness, and shame-guilt. Qualitative expressions for preferences and perceptions were analysed using interpretive thematic analysis. 41 Malaysian women were interviewed. The majority preferred messages that incorporated hope, authority, or fear appeals. Messages with an authority appeal were favoured for their personalised and authoritative effect. Messages using hope and fear appeals elicited emotional reactions and cognitive appraisals that contributed to their favourability. In contrast, humour, sadness, and shame-guilt were the most disliked appeals. The humour appeal was generally disliked because it caused interpretations that weakened the persuasive impact of the advocated behaviour in the message. Messages incorporating sadness and shame-guilt appeals were disliked primarily due to their negative framing. In conclusion, public health messages incorporating hope, authority, or fear appeals show promising potential to motivate breast cancer screening among Malaysian women, and their effectiveness in influencing actual behaviour change should be further explored.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-31687-7.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MONDO:0004989)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** PXK (PX domain containing serine/threonine kinase like) [NCBI Gene 54899] {aka MONAKA, SLOB}
- **Diseases:** cancer (MESH:D009369), sick (MESH:D008881), Breast cancer (MESH:D001943), anxiety (MESH:D001007), death (MESH:D003643)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12796188/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12796188/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12796188/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12796188