P-1936. Antifungal prophylaxis with echinocandin in high-risk liver transplant: a single-centre experience
Andrea Lombardi, Giulia Viero, Barbara Antonelli, Clara Dibenedetto, Vittorio Scaravilli, Luca Del Prete, Giulia Renisi, Laura Alagna, Anna Celotti, Giacomo Grasselli, Pietro Lampertico, Cristiano Quintini, Alessandra Bandera

TL;DR
This study shows that high-risk liver transplant patients on echinocandin prophylaxis still face fungal infections, highlighting the need for better early detection.
Contribution
The study provides insights into the efficacy of echinocandin prophylaxis in high-risk liver transplant patients and identifies risk factors for fungal infections.
Findings
High-risk liver transplant patients had a significantly higher incidence of invasive fungal infections (9.41%) compared to non-high-risk patients (1.99%).
Caspofungin prophylaxis was effective against Candida infections but less so against mould infections, which were likely present at transplantation.
Risk factors for IFI included diabetes, high MELD score, prolonged hospitalization, and extended antibiotic exposure.
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LTx) is the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease, but it carries a high risk of post-operative infections, particularly invasive fungal infections (IFIs). IFIs contribute to morbidity and mortality among LTx recipients, especially in high-risk patients. Current guidelines recommend targeted antifungal prophylaxis in patients with defined risk factors, but optimal strategies are still debated. This retrospective, single-center study evaluated the postoperative course of 286 adult LTx recipients at Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan, Italy, from January 2017 to September 2023. Patients were stratified into high-risk and non-high-risk groups based on institutional criteria, and a 14-day targeted antifungal prophylaxis regimen with echinocandin (primarily caspofungin) was administered to high-risk patients. The primary…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes · Antifungal resistance and susceptibility · Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
