# P-2165. Comparison of Incidence Reporting and Outcomes of Infections in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CART) Cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies (BsAb) Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Pharmacovigilance Study

## TL;DR

This study compares infection rates and outcomes in multiple myeloma patients treated with CAR-T cells or bispecific antibodies, highlighting higher risks with CAR-T.

## Contribution

The study provides new comparative insights into infection incidence and mortality outcomes between CAR-T and BsAb therapies using FDA adverse event data.

## Key findings

- CAR-T therapy had a 14.40% infection rate compared to 32.20% in BsAb therapy.
- Infections combined with immune syndromes were significantly higher in CAR-T (20.0%) than in BsAb (6.10%).

## Abstract

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell and Bispecific Antibody (BsAb) therapies have revolutionized the management of multiple myeloma (MM). However, they are associated with an increased risk of infections, particularly due to lymphopenia, neutropenia, Immune-Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), Cytokine Release syndrome (CRS), and Immune-effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (IECHLH).Table 1Comparing incidence of infections in the presence of ICANS CRS or IECHLHFigure 1Comparing mortality outcomes from infections and immune dysregulation in the presence of CRS/ICANS/IECHLH in CART versus BsAb group represented on Forest Plot

Comparing incidence of infections in the presence of ICANS CRS or IECHLH

Comparing mortality outcomes from infections and immune dysregulation in the presence of CRS/ICANS/IECHLH in CART versus BsAb group represented on Forest Plot

The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was accessed in April 2025 to conduct the study. Therapies analyzed were CAR-T (Ciltacabtagene, Idecabtagene) and BsAb constructs (Teclistamab, Talquetamab, Elranatanab). The number of patients, cases of various infections, and immune dysfunction events were collected for each group. The association of infections with CRS, ICANS, or IECHLH was analyzed. Infection rates were calculated as the proportion of reported events per total event following therapy. Categorical comparisons between therapies were conducted using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for outcomes of infections in the presence of CRS, ICANS, or IECHLH for CAR-T versus BsAb comparisons. Statistical significance was set at a two-sided p-value < 0.05.

The total incidence of infections and immune dysregulation in the CAR-T versus BsAb group was 14.40% and 32.20%, statistically significant (p< 0.01). Hypogammaglobulinemia had the highest incidence in the CAR-T group (1.31%), followed by fungal infections (1.20%), while cytomegalovirus infections (1.79%) were the highest in BsAb, followed by hypogammaglobulinemia (1.58%). Infections and immune dysregulation in the presence of CRS, ICANS, or IECHLH were higher in CAR-T than in BsAb (20.0% vs 6.10%; p< 0.01) (Table 1). The odds ratio comparing differences in outcomes in patients with infections in the presence of CRS, ICANS, or IECHLH is illustrated in the forest plot (Figure 1).

CAR-T and BsAb therapies are game-changers in treating MM but have drawbacks. Infections are the leading cause of non-relapse mortality in this group, further complicated by immune syndromes. This study underscores the importance of consensus on

anti-infective prophylaxis in this patient population.

All Authors: No reported disclosures