P-1498. Real-World Vaccine Effectiveness and Impact of the 4CMenB Vaccine in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: A Systematic Literature Review
Pavo Marijic, Lucian Gaianu, Gaurav Mathur, Thatiana Pinto, Anar Andani, Reena Ladak, Elise Kuylen, Karolina Szewczyk, Elzbieta Olewinska, Beata Smela, Helen Petousis-Harris, Zeki Kocaata

TL;DR
This study reviews real-world data to assess how well the 4CMenB vaccine protects infants, children, and adolescents against meningococcal disease and how much it reduces disease incidence.
Contribution
The study provides a systematic review of global real-world evidence on the 4CMenB vaccine's effectiveness and impact across different age groups.
Findings
High vaccine effectiveness (59–100%) was observed in infants, children, and adolescents after 2–4 doses of 4CMenB.
The vaccine significantly reduced MenB incidence by up to 94% in several regions after several years of implementation.
Vaccine impact varied by region and age group but was consistently substantial in reducing disease rates.
Abstract
Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) is a leading cause of invasive meningococcal disease. The multicomponent MenB vaccine (4CMenB) has been widely used since 2013. To establish a robust range of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and determine the vaccine impact (VI) of 4CMenB programs on MenB incidence in infants, children, and adolescents, a systematic literature review of real-world evidence was conducted.Figure 1.4CMenB Vaccine Effectiveness Against MenB in Fully Vaccinated Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Young AdultsTable 1.Study References for Vaccine Effectiveness and Impact 4CMenB Vaccine Effectiveness Against MenB in Fully Vaccinated Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Study References for Vaccine Effectiveness and Impact MEDLINE, Embase, gray literature, and clinical trial registries were searched in November 2024; studies were screened against preset criteria per…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacterial Infections and Vaccines · Virology and Viral Diseases · Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
