# 87. Refractory, Resistant and Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

## TL;DR

This study identifies risk factors and outcomes for difficult-to-treat CMV infections in organ transplant patients.

## Contribution

The paper provides new insights into risk factors for refractory, resistant, and recurrent CMV infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

## Key findings

- Low absolute lymphocyte count and early post-transplant timing are linked to refractory CMV.
- High initial CMV DNA levels are associated with drug-resistant CMV.
- CMV recurrence is common and may be linked to low lymphocyte counts after treatment.

## Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains one of the most prevalent and important infections following solid organ transplant (SOT). Treatment is often challenging, especially when dealing with refractory and resistant CMV infections.Table 1:Univariable logistic regression analyses of associations with early refractory CMV infectionTable 2:Univariable logistic regression analyses of associations with resistant CMV infection

Univariable logistic regression analyses of associations with early refractory CMV infection

Univariable logistic regression analyses of associations with resistant CMV infection

We performed a retrospective cohort study of SOT recipients with clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) at a tertiary transplant center in the US during 2010-2016. The primary outcome was early refractory CMV infection and secondary outcomes were drug resistance, CMV recurrence, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimation, univariable logistic regression analysis, and multivariable Cox regression were used for outcome analysis.Table 3:Multivariable Cox regression analysis of associations with recurrent CMV infection after primary treatment endedNote: Refractory CMV was not included in the model for recurrent CMV as no patients with refractory infection had recurrence.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of associations with recurrent CMV infection after primary treatment ended

Note: Refractory CMV was not included in the model for recurrent CMV as no patients with refractory infection had recurrence.

A total of 145 SOT recipients with csCMVi were included. Most patients were recipients of liver (49%), followed by kidney (22.1%), heart (6.9%), lung (5.5%), and pancreas (4.1%). Multiple organ transplants accounted for 12.4% of the cohort. Most common induction was an anti-IL-2 antibody (43.9%) followed by ATG (29.5%). 82 (56.5%) had CMV D+/R- mismatch. In total, 34 (23.4%) had CMV syndrome, 38 (26.2%) had tissue-invasive CMV disease, while the rest (50.3%) were asymptomatic. After the initial 3 weeks of antiviral therapy, 13 (8.9%) patients had probable refractory csCMVi; most of them (10 [76.9%]) were CMV D+/R- mismatch. Longer time after transplant had lower risk (OR 0.68; CI 0.48-0.95, p=0.029) while lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was higher risk of early refractory csCMVi (OR 1.54; CI 1.01-2.44, p=0.048) (Table 1). Drug-resistant CMV occurred in 7 patients (4.8%); a high initial CMV DNA level was associated with resistant csCMVi (OR 2; CI 1.08-3.93, p=0.031) (Table 2). Of 144 patients with post-treatment follow-up, 25 (17.2%) experienced recurrent csCMVi within 6 months. Table 3 shows the associations with recurrence of csCMVi after initial treatment. 30 patients (20.7%) died during a median follow-up of 4 years, but refractory, resistant or recurrent CMV were not associated with mortality.

Refractory csCMVi is associated with low ALC and an earlier onset post-transplant. Resistant csCMVi is associated with high levels of initial CMV DNA. Recurrence of csCMVi is common and possibly associated with low ALC at the end of antiviral treatment.

All Authors: No reported disclosures