P-387. Evaluation of Treatment Satisfaction and Experiences Among People With HIV When Switching to Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide From Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine: Results From the Phase 4 EMPOWER Study
Samir K Gupta, Thomas C S Martin, Cyril Gaultier, Alexandra Kissling, Kathleen Beusterien, Megan Chen, Megan Dunbar, Hui Liu, Brenda Ng, Moti Ramgopal

TL;DR
A study found that people with HIV who switched from injectable to oral HIV treatment reported higher satisfaction and fewer side effects.
Contribution
This study evaluates treatment satisfaction and experiences when switching from injectable to oral HIV therapy in a real-world setting.
Findings
Participants reported a mean increase in treatment satisfaction of 28 (6.8) points after switching therapies.
All participants achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at W4 and W12.
The most common reason for switching was due to side effects from the injectable regimen.
Abstract
Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) is a guideline-recommended treatment for HIV that has shown high levels of efficacy. EMPOWER assessed experiences with and reasons for switching to daily oral B/F/TAF from bimonthly injectable cabotegravir + rilpivirine (CAB + RPV) among people with HIV (PWH). This Phase 4, single-arm, open-label multicenter study (NCT06104306) assessed switching to B/F/TAF in virologically suppressed PWH unable to continue on CAB + RPV or who expressed a preference to switch to oral therapy. Participants were aged ≥ 18 years, had received ≥ 1 (and no missed) doses of CAB + RPV, and had documented HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months prior to screening. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: status version (HIVTSQs) at baseline (BL), Week (W)12, and W24. Satisfaction with treatment change was…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · HIV-related health complications and treatments
