P-1527. Growth rate comparisons for clinical Escherichia coli (EC) isolates in various media stratified by inner colony (IC) production during fosfomycin (FOF) disk diffusion (DD) testing
Tiffany Chang, Lindsey Collins, Jenna Salay, Khadijah Malik, Alexis J Walters, Aalunya A Teso, Katlin K Her, Morgan L Bixby, Elizabeth B Hirsch

TL;DR
This study compares the growth rates of Escherichia coli isolates in different media to determine if inner colony production during fosfomycin testing affects in vitro fitness.
Contribution
The study provides evidence that inner colonies do not exhibit significant in vitro fitness loss compared to their producers in various media conditions.
Findings
No consistent pattern of longer generation times was observed among isolates in different media.
There were no significant differences in generation times between inner colonies and their producers in most conditions.
Whole genome sequencing and murine infection models are suggested for further investigation.
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted the frequent presence of IC during FOF DD testing. It is assumed that increased resistance comes with fitness trade-off; however, our previous work in Klebsiella pneumoniae suggests in vitro fitness of IC are highly similar to IC-producers (IC-P) from which they arose. Therefore, we compared growth rates of susceptible EC never-producers (NP), IC-P, and their non-susceptible IC alone and together in various media to compare in vitro fitness differences. Single-isolate time growth (sTG) and competition TG (cTG) were conducted over 24 hours and 72 hours, respectively. An initial inoculum of 10⁵ CFU/mL was used for sTG in nutrient-rich Mueller-Hinton broth (1× MHB), nutrient-depleted (0.25× MHB), and filter-sterilized pooled human urine where CFU/mL was serially measured. For cTG, inoculum of equal parts IC-P and IC was added to a flask of 1x MHB at t0,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEscherichia coli research studies · Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria · Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
