# P-1155. Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Imipenem/Relebactam and Comparators Against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Patients with Invasive Respiratory Infections: SMART United States, 2021-2023

**Authors:** Mark G Wise, Karri A A Bauer, John Esterly, Fakhar Siddiqui, Katherine Young, Mary Motyl, Daniel F Sahm

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1348 · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · 2026-01-11

## TL;DR

This study compares the effectiveness of two antibiotic combinations against respiratory infections caused by specific bacteria in hospitalized patients.

## Contribution

The study provides updated data on antibiotic susceptibility patterns in respiratory infections stratified by hospital stay duration and infection type.

## Key findings

- IMR and meropenem showed high activity against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales isolates.
- Ceftolozane/tazobactam was most effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa regardless of infection type.
- P. aeruginosa isolates from invasive samples showed lower susceptibility compared to non-invasive samples.

## Abstract

Gram-negative bacteria can be the cause of life-threating invasive respiratory tract infections (RTIs), including pneumonia, tracheobronchitis, and lung abscesses. Imipenem/relebactam (IMR) is a combination of imipenem with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) combines ceftolozane, an anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin, with tazobactam. We evaluated the activity of IMR, C/T and comparators against isolates of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) that were collected in the US for the SMART surveillance program (2021-2023) from patients with invasive and non-invasive respiratory samples stratified by length of hospital stay (< 48h [presumed community-acquired infections] vs. ≥48h [presumed hospital-acquired infections]).

In 2021-2023, 27 sites in the US collected up to 100 Gram-negative pathogens per year from patients with RTIs. Invasive vs. non-invasive disease categories were based on sampling source (invasive: bronchial brushing, bronchoalveolar lavage, endotracheal aspirate, lungs, thoracentesis; non-invasive: sputum or other). MICs were determined via CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted with 2025 CLSI criteria. Among Enterobacterales, only NME were considered as the Morganellaceae display intrinsic reduced susceptibility to imipenem by a mechanism other than β-lactamase production.

Susceptibility to commonly used β-lactams was generally lower among NME from presumed hospital-acquired infections compared to community-acquired (Fig. 1). No clear pattern was linked to invasive vs. non-invasive infections. IMR and meropenem were the most active agents in all categories, inhibiting >97% of the NME. Among PA, isolates from invasive samples consistently displayed lower susceptibility than those from non-invasive infections, regardless of length of hospital stay (Fig. 2). C/T was the most active agent in all categories (inhibiting ≥94.7%) followed by IMR (≥87.4% inhibited).

IMR is an important treatment option for patients with respiratory tract infections caused by NME, while C/T was the most active agent against P. aeruginosa causing RTIs, regardless of length of stay or invasive disease.

Mark G Wise, PhD, IHMA: Employee Karri A. A. Bauer, PharmD, Merck: Employee Fakhar Siddiqui, MD, MBA, Merck & Co Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Katherine Young, M.S., Merck & Co., Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Mary Motyl, Ph.D., Merck and Co., Inc.: employee

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (PubChem CID 86291594), meropenem (PubChem CID 441130)
- **Diseases:** pneumonia (MONDO:0005249), tracheobronchitis (MONDO:0021925)
- **Species:** Enterobacterales (taxon 91347), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (taxon 287)

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12791938/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12791938