P-1517. Adult Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination Receipt among Adults Testing Negative for RSV – VISION Network, October 1, 2024—March 31, 2025
Morgan Najdowski, Josephine Mak, Cassandra A Hathaway, Patrick K Mitchell, Angela Cheung, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez, Kristin K Dascomb, Stephanie Irving, Nicola P Klein, Shaun J Grannis, Toan Ong, Adriana V Resendez, Sarah W Ball, Jingran Cao, Charlene E McEvoy, Tamara Sheffield

TL;DR
This study analyzed RSV vaccination rates among adults who tested negative for RSV and found that receiving other respiratory vaccines was the strongest predictor of RSV vaccination.
Contribution
The study identifies factors associated with RSV vaccination in test-negative patients, providing insights for vaccine effectiveness and policy.
Findings
RSV vaccination was more common in older adults and increased over time.
Receiving both influenza and COVID-19 vaccines was strongly associated with RSV vaccination.
RSV vaccination rates were lower in patients aged 60-64 compared to those aged ≥75.
Abstract
On June 26, 2024, the CDC updated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine recommendations to a single dose of RSV vaccine for all adults aged ≥ 75 years and adults aged 60-74 years with increased risk of severe RSV disease. Using electronic health record (EHR) data from the VISION platform, we described characteristics of patients testing negative for RSV who did and did not receive an RSV vaccine and assessed factors associated with RSV vaccine receipt.Figure 1:Characteristics associated with receipt of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination among test-negative patients with an emergency department (ED) encounter for RSV-like illness (RLI) during the 2024-2025 season in the VISION network, N=23,403 patientsFigure 2:Characteristics associated with receipt of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine among test-negative patients with an inpatient encounter for RSV-like illness…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRespiratory viral infections research · SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
