644. Disparities in Screening and Test Positivity for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Among Adolescent and Young Adult Women in a Massachusetts Integrated Healthcare System, 2016–2024
Sarah Naz-McLean, Lisa A Cosimi, Ann E Woolley, Ann Burchell, Amaya Perez-Brumer

TL;DR
This study finds that young women from marginalized groups face higher rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea infections and are more likely to seek testing in urgent care settings, highlighting inequities in sexual health screening.
Contribution
The study identifies disparities in CT/NG testing and positivity among adolescent and young adult women in Massachusetts, linking them to demographic and care-setting factors.
Findings
CT and NG positivity rates were highest among women aged 15-19, Black, Hispanic, and uninsured individuals.
Black, Hispanic, and uninsured women were more likely to test in acute care settings and present with symptoms.
Findings suggest inequities in access to non-acute sexual health screening for marginalized groups.
Abstract
Young women in the U.S. aged 15–24 bear among the highest burden of chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (NG) infections. Despite national guidelines recommending annual screening for women under 25, screening uptake remains suboptimal. This study examines demographic patterns in CT/NG testing and positivity to understand how access to different care settings shapes testing uptake to inform routine sexual health screening strategies. Data are derived from cisgender women and adolescents aged 15–29 tested for CT/NG within the Mass General Brigham integrated healthcare system between January 2016 and January 2024. Laboratory records were linked to the closest clinical encounter within 7 days. Descriptive statistics summarized test volume, positivity, and diagnoses by demographics and care setting. Bivariate and multivariable Poisson GEE models estimated the risk ratios (RR) between demographic…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive tract infections research · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
