# P-1341. Monotherapy with Trimethroprim/Sulfamethoxazole or Minocycline for the Treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

**Authors:** Zakery Kujat, Amima Mahmood, Alex Huang, Shannon Olson, Paige Roberts, Jing Zhao, Marco R Scipione

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1529 · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · 2026-01-11

## TL;DR

This study compares the effectiveness of two antibiotics, TMP/SMX and MINO, for treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections and finds similar outcomes.

## Contribution

The study provides comparative clinical data on monotherapy with TMP/SMX and MINO for S. maltophilia infections, despite current guidelines recommending against monotherapy.

## Key findings

- No significant difference in 28-day mortality between TMP/SMX and MINO.
- Similar rates of microbiological cure and clinical response at end of therapy for both treatments.
- Higher incidence of acute kidney injury in the MINO group compared to TMP/SMX.

## Abstract

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and minocycline (MINO) are both recommended for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, however, there is a lack of comparative clinical data and IDSA guidance recommends against the use of monotherapy with any agent. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes between patients treated with TMP/SMX or MINO monotherapy for infections due to S. maltophilia.Table 1.Patient and Treatment CharacteristicsFIgure 1.Mortality Outcomes

Patient and Treatment Characteristics

Mortality Outcomes

This is a retrospective cohort study from 8/20/19 to 2/19/24. Adult patients with clinical signs of infection; a culture growing S. maltophilia; and who received TMP/SMX or MINO ≥ 48 hours were included. Patients were excluded if they received combination therapy; had a non-susceptible S. maltophilia isolate; died or were transferred to hospice within 48 hrs of treatment; or had S. maltophilia isolated from the urine. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, microbiological cure and clinical response at the end of therapy (EOT), and acute kidney injury.Table 2.Other Clinical Outcomes

Other Clinical Outcomes

A total of 109 patients were included (TMP/SMX=59; MINO=50). A majority of patients were male (64%) and African American (65%). The median age was 57 years (46-66) for TMP/SMX and 64 years (44-72) for MINO, p=0.22. SOFA score (5 vs. 4, p=0.97) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 4, p=0.07) were similar between TMP/SMX and MINO, respectively. The most common source of infection in both groups was pneumonia (74% vs. 83%, p=0.25). A majority of cultures were polymicrobial (80% vs. 66%, p=0.11). The median TMP/SMX dose was 11 mg/kg (7.5-14.7 mg/kg), and the median MINO dose was 200mg/day. The median duration of therapy was 7 days in both groups. There was no difference in 28-day all-cause mortality (25% vs. 20%, p=0.50), in-hospital mortality (31% vs. 32%, p=0.87), microbiological cure at EOT (43% vs. 50%, p=0.63), and clinical response at EOT (63% vs. 62%, p=0.94) for TMP/SMX and MINO, respectively. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 15% of TMP/SMX and 33% of MINO patients (p=0.30) with more patients developing failure in the MINO group (2% vs. 21%, p=0.005).

TMP/SMX had similar rates of mortality and clinical outcomes when compared to MINO for the treatment of S. maltophilia. Further studies should be conducted to confirm the findings of this study.

All Authors: No reported disclosures

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (PubChem CID 358641), minocycline (PubChem CID 54675783)
- **Species:** Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (taxon 40324)

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12791490/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12791490