# Exploring Sprint Kinematics in American Football Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

**Authors:** Naoaki Ito, Yi‐Chung Lin, Jack A. Martin, Silvia S. Blemker, David A. Opar, Stephanie A. Kliethermes, Bryan C. Heiderscheit, A. Wayne Johnson, A. Wayne Johnson, Anthony Beutler, Anthony Nguyen, Ashleigh Homer, Brett Mortensen, Casey Metoyer, Claire Tanaka, Dain Allred, Danielle Heidt, Darren Campbell, Emma Remington, Erin Hammer, Geoffrey Baer, Jack Hickey, Jennifer Sanfilippo, John Wagle, Jonathon Hauenstein, Jordan Reyes, Josh Huff, Kenneth Lee, Kurrel Fabian, Lara Riem, Malorie Wilwand, Matthew Cousins, Matthew Kuehl, Michael Moll, Mikel Joachim, Nicholas Port, Nirav Maniar, Olivia DuCharme, Ryan Peot, Ryan Timmins, Sarah Sund, Xue Feng

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/sms.70200 · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · 2026-01-11

## TL;DR

This study found that American football athletes who had ACL surgery showed no significant differences in knee movement or stance time during sprinting, even two years post-surgery.

## Contribution

The study introduces IMU-based methods as a feasible clinical tool for assessing on-field sprint biomechanics in athletes after ACLR.

## Key findings

- No significant limb or time effects were observed in knee kinematics or stance time during sprinting.
- Athletes two years post-ACLR did not show asymmetrical knee joint kinematics during high-effort sprinting.
- Gait asymmetries observed in submaximal activities may not persist during maximal sprinting.

## Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare stance time and knee joint kinematics between limbs during sprinting in Division‐1 collegiate American football athletes with a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This secondary analysis used data from an ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study of NCAA Division‐1 American football athletes. Sprint biomechanics were collected using wearable inertial measurement units during on‐field, maximal effort overground sprints. Knee kinematic variables of interest included stance time, knee flexion angle at initial contact, peak knee flexion angle, and knee flexion excursion during the stance phase from 2 to 5 strides near peak sprinting speed. Linear mixed effects models were used to evaluate the main effects of limb (involved vs. uninvolved), time from surgery, and their interaction on variables of interest, adjusted for peak sprint speed. Twenty male athletes (mean age: 21.2 ± 1.3 years; time from surgery: 28.0 ± 18.5 months) were fully participating in American football without limitations at the time of testing and met inclusion criteria. No significant limb × time interactions (p = 0.3–0.60) or main effects of limb (p = 0.23–0.84) or time (p = 0.08–0.84) were observed for any of our variables of interest. Division‐1 American football athletes approximately 2 years post‐ACLR did not demonstrate asymmetrical knee joint kinematics or stance time during sprinting. While gait asymmetries are commonly observed after ACLR during submaximal walking and running, these differences may diminish at high effort levels required during sprinting. IMU‐based methods provide a clinically feasible approach for assessing on‐field sprint biomechanics in athletes after ACLR.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ACLR (MESH:D000070598), asymmetries (MESH:D005146)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12791081/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12791081/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12791081/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12791081