# Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium Filtering in Population Genomics: Empirical Review and Decision Framework for Improved Practice

**Authors:** Yu‐Hsun Hsu

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ece3.72688 · Ecology and Evolution · 2026-01-09

## TL;DR

This paper reviews the inconsistent use of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium filtering in population genomics and proposes a decision framework to improve its biological relevance and transparency.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a decision framework for HWE filtering that emphasizes biological context and reproducibility.

## Key findings

- Awareness of HWE filtering limitations is increasing but has not led to consistent practice.
- There is limited reporting of filtering thresholds and justifications in empirical studies.
- Population-aware and structure-informed filtering tools are reviewed as recent advances.

## Abstract

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) filtering remains widely used in population genomics, but its application remains inconsistent, often lacking detailed justification, and not always aligned with biological context. To evaluate whether conceptual awareness has translated into methodological change, we review empirical studies citing Pearman et al. (2022), a representative study testing the impacts of different grouping approaches for HWE filtering. While pooled filtering is becoming rare, we found a decreasing but still considerable heterogeneity in the decision of filtering schemes, limited reporting of thresholds, and few explicit justifications for applied approaches. These patterns suggest that awareness of HWE filtering limitations is increasing but has not yet led to consistent practice. We synthesise the biological and technical causes of HWE deviation, review recent advances, including population‐aware and structure‐informed filtering tools, and propose a transparent decision framework for population genomic studies. Rather than a default quality‐control step, HWE filtering should be applied as a hypothesis‐aware decision that reflects study aims and biological context. A citation‐based mini‐survey and decision workflow are provided to support biologically informed and reproducible applications.

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) filtering is widely used in population genomics, but its application remains inconsistent and often lacks biological justification. This review went through recent empirical studies that demonstrate awareness of these issues to assess whether conceptual understanding has led to improved practice. This review synthesises the causes of HWE deviation and proposes a biologically informed decision workflow to support transparent filtering applications.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Hyperoodon ampullatus (northern bottlenose whale, species) [taxon 48744], Harpagifer antarcticus (Antarctic spiny plunderfish, species) [taxon 43256], Zostera marina (species) [taxon 29655], Myodes glareolus (bank vole, species) [taxon 447135], Acridotheres tristis (common myna, species) [taxon 279927]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12789822/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12789822/full.md

## References

59 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12789822/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12789822