# Carbon dynamics of a controlled peatland rewetting experiment in the Norwegian boreal zone

**Authors:** Michael A. H. Bekken, Astrid Vatne, Poul Larsen, Andreas Ibrom, Klaus Steenberg Larsen, Bo Elberling, Kristoffer Aalstad, Sebastian Westermann, Jacqueline K. Knutson, Lena M. Tallaksen, Peter Dörsch, Peter Horvath, Anders Bryn, Norbert Pirk

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-30836-2 · Scientific Reports · 2025-12-17

## TL;DR

A study in Norway found that rewetting drained peatlands increased carbon dioxide and methane emissions in the short term.

## Contribution

The study uses BART counterfactual modeling to estimate the impact of peatland rewetting on carbon fluxes.

## Key findings

- Rewetting increased CO2 emissions by 80.3 ± 49 g CO2-C m− 2 two years post-rewetting.
- Methane emissions increased slightly after rewetting but remained relatively stable.
- Control site remained a carbon source with consistent CO2 and CH4 fluxes over four years.

## Abstract

A controlled peatland rewetting experiment was conducted on two adjacent drained peatland sites in southeastern Norway. Eddy covariance monitoring of CO2 and CH4 fluxes at both sites began in 2019. In 2021, the Treatment Site was rewetted while the Control Site remained drained. Using nine environmental variables and the processed flux data as training data, Bayesian Additive Regression Tree (BART) models were used to generate annual flux balances for CO2 and CH4. The 4-year mean annual flux at the Control Site was 17.3 ± 10 g CO2-C m− 2 yr− 1 and 4.6 ± 0.1 g CH4-C m− 2 yr− 1. At the Treatment Site, the 2-year mean annual flux before the rewetting was 12.2 ± 3.8 g CO2-C m− 2 yr− 1 and 1.8 ± 0.04 g CH4-C m− 2 yr− 1. In the first year after rewetting the annual flux was 53.3 ± 13 g CO2-C m− 2 yr− 1 and 3.8 ± 0.3 g CH4-C m− 2 yr− 1, and in the second year after rewetting the annual flux was 41.2 ± 18 g CO2-C m− 2 yr− 1 and 3.4 ± 0.4 g CH4-C m− 2 yr− 1. BART counterfactual modeling was able to estimate the effect of the rewetting on CO2 and CH4 fluxes. Two years after the rewetting, the BART counterfactual modeling estimated that the cumulative fluxes had increased by 80.3 ± 49 g CO2-C m− 2 and 3.4 ± 0.47 g CH4-C m− 2 because of the rewetting. Carbon flux monitoring of both sites is ongoing as the Control Site remains drained and the soil and vegetation at the Treatment Site continues to adjust to the altered hydrological regime after rewetting.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-30836-2.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** CH4 (MESH:D008697), CO2 (MESH:D002245), Carbon (MESH:D002244)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12789543/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12789543/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12789543/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12789543