Cognitive decline and auditory biomarkers: P300 as a diagnostic tool
Michele da Rocha Anselmo, Lucélia Epifânio Pereira da Silva, Bianca Melo Gonçalves, Lara Catarine Inácio da Silva, Giovanna Correia Pereira Moro, Bruna Fulgêncio Dias, Gabriela Tomé Oliveira Engelmann, Bernardo de Mattos Viana, Maria Aparecida Camargos Bicalho, Ludimila Labanca

TL;DR
The study shows that P300, an auditory brain signal, can help distinguish between mild cognitive impairment and dementia based on differences in signal latency.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that P300 latency is significantly prolonged in dementia compared to mild cognitive impairment, suggesting its use as a biomarker.
Findings
Dementia patients had significantly longer P300 latencies (395.63ms) compared to those with MCI (355.07ms).
No significant differences were found in N100, P160, or N200 latencies or in specific amplitude measurements between groups.
P300 latency is a potential biomarker for assessing cognitive impairment severity.
Abstract
Over 54% of dementia cases in South America are linked to modifiable factors, emphasizing the need for interventions to prevent or slow its progression. Auditory evoked potentials, electrical signals generated by the auditory system in response to sound stimuli, may serve as valuable diagnostic tools. This comparative cross‐sectional study, approved by the institutional ethics committee, included clinical, neuropsychological, and audiological assessments, along with the P300 exam. Participants with severe or profound hearing loss, abnormal tympanometry, traumatic brain injury, stroke, or inability to complete the tests were excluded. A trained audiologist conducted the P300 exam using electrodes placed at the frontal, vertex, and parietal midline, referenced to the ears. Tone bursts of 1000 Hz (frequent) and 2000 Hz (rare) were delivered at 90 dB (300 total stimuli), and participants…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
