# Evaluation Starch-Based Hemostatic Agents “BioSight” as Adhesion Prevention Barrier Tested in an Adhesion Model in Rats

**Authors:** Yi-Xin Liu, Chen-Ying Su, Min-Hsuan Yen, Chih-Hwa Chen, Chih-Yu Chen, Hsu-Wei Fang

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/polym18010033 · Polymers · 2025-12-23

## TL;DR

This study tests a new starch-based product called BioSight to prevent post-surgery abdominal adhesions in rats, showing it works as well as an existing product.

## Contribution

BioSight, a starch-based hemostatic agent, demonstrates effective adhesion prevention comparable to a predicate device in a rat model.

## Key findings

- BioSight showed consistently low adhesion scores (≤0.4) up to 12 weeks in a rat model.
- Histological analysis confirmed reduced adhesion thickness with BioSight compared to controls.
- The starch-based hydrogel supports hemostasis and has a balanced biodegradation profile without adverse reactions.

## Abstract

Background: Postoperative abdominal adhesions are a common and serious complication following abdominal surgery, often leading to chronic pain, bowel obstruction, or infertility. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the new starch-based absorbable hemostatic agent and dressing, BioSight, in comparison with a predicate device (4DryField® PH) for the prevention of abdominal adhesions in a rat model. Methods: A total of 90 Sprague–Dawley rats were used to establish an intra-abdominal adhesion model and assigned to the BioSight, 4DryField® PH, or control group. Standardized injuries were created on the cecum and parietal peritoneum, followed by application of the designated materials. Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, and 12 weeks for macroscopic adhesion scoring and histopathological evaluation. Adhesion area, adhesion strength, and tissue thickness were assessed using established scoring systems, and local healing was examined by H&E staining. All quantitative data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Conclusions: In a rat peritoneal adhesion model, BioSight exhibited pronounced anti-adhesion efficacy comparable to 4DryField® PH. Macroscopic evaluation showed consistently low adhesion scores (≤0.4) across all time points up to 12 weeks, while histological analysis confirmed reduced adhesion thickness, with BioSight displaying numerically lower values, particularly at early stages (251.3 ± 137.4 µm vs. 323.2 ± 174.6 µm at Week 2). This performance is attributed to rapid in situ hydrogel formation that provides effective temporary tissue separation, limits early fibrin deposition and inflammatory cell infiltration, and supports hemostasis. Importantly, the starch-based hydrogel exhibits a balanced biodegradation profile—persisting long enough to protect injured tissues during the critical inflammatory and fibroproliferative phases, yet undergoing complete enzymatic resorption thereafter without adverse tissue reactions. Collectively, these results highlight the anti-adhesion functionality of BioSight and support the clinical potential of plant-derived starch-based bioresorbable surgical adjuncts.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** abdominal adhesions (MESH:D000007), chronic pain (MESH:D059350), inflammatory (MESH:D007249), bowel obstruction (MESH:D012778), infertility (MESH:D007246), peritoneal adhesion (MESH:D010538)
- **Chemicals:** Starch (MESH:D013213), BioSight (-), H&amp;E (MESH:D006371)
- **Species:** Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12787879/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12787879/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12787879/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12787879