# ChronoimmunoTOX: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study on How the Time of Administration Impacts Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy and Toxicity in Melanoma

**Authors:** Alessandro Nepote, Gilles Burghgraeve, Martino Pedrani, Anderson Junior Gomez Ramos, Isabella Saporita, Vito Spataro, Vittoria Espeli, Ricardo Pereira Mestre, Dario Sangiolo, Martina Imbimbo, Cristina Mangas

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm15010069 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2025-12-22

## TL;DR

This study found that administering immune checkpoint inhibitors in the morning may improve survival and reduce the need for immunosuppression in melanoma patients.

## Contribution

The study is the first to show that the time of administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors affects their efficacy and toxicity in melanoma.

## Key findings

- Morning administration was linked to significantly better progression-free and overall survival.
- Afternoon-treated patients more often required immunosuppression for severe toxicities.
- The overall incidence of immune-related adverse events was similar between groups.

## Abstract

Background: The timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration may influence clinical outcomes, incidence, and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but evidence remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 41 patients with advanced melanoma treated with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab at the Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana between 2018 and 2024. Infusions completed before 2:00 p.m. were classified as morning (AM). Patients receiving ≥50% of doses in the morning were assigned to the AM group; the remaining patients comprised the afternoon (PM) group. Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the AM group and twenty in the PM group. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the AM group, compared with 7.8 months in the PM group (univariate HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.70; p = 0.006). Overall survival (OS) was also significantly improved in the AM group (univariate HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.80; p = 0.019). The overall incidence of irAEs was similar between groups. However, systemic immunosuppression for grade ≥ 2 toxicities was more frequently required in the PM group (80% vs. 52%, p = 0.06). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, morning administration of ICIs was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with advanced melanoma. While irAE incidence was comparable between groups, patients treated in the afternoon more often required systemic immunosuppression.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** melanoma (MONDO:0005105)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Toxicity (MESH:D064420), Melanoma (MESH:D008545)
- **Chemicals:** nivolumab (MESH:D000077594), ipilimumab (MESH:D000074324), ChronoimmunoTOX (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12787149/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12787149/full.md

## References

52 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12787149/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12787149