# Rural General Practitioners’ Perceptions of the Barriers and Facilitators of Chronic Disease and Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Care Through Lifestyle Management—A Western Australian Qualitative Study

## TL;DR

This study explores how rural doctors in Western Australia manage chronic diseases through lifestyle changes, identifying key challenges and solutions.

## Contribution

The study provides novel insights into rural healthcare challenges and facilitators for chronic disease management in Western Australia.

## Key findings

- Geographic isolation and socioeconomic factors are major barriers to chronic disease care in rural areas.
- Co-located teams and better remuneration for preventive care are key facilitators for effective lifestyle management.
- Workforce shortages and lack of allied health professionals hinder rural chronic disease management.

## Abstract

Background: Chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease and their cardiometabolic risk factors require management, which includes lifestyle interventions. Rural and remote residents are disproportionately affected by these conditions compared to their urban counterparts. Studies have examined barriers to chronic disease and cardiometabolic risk factor management in urban environments, but rural perspectives remain underexplored, especially in Western Australia (WA) with its vast geography. This study examined rural general practitioners’ (GPs) views on barriers and facilitators to chronic disease and cardiometabolic care in rural WA through lifestyle management. Methods: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 15 rural WA GPs recruited via rural networks using convenience and snowball sampling. Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify patterns and themes within the qualitative data that addressed the study questions. Results: According to rural general practitioners, major barriers to chronic disease and cardiometabolic risk care included geographic isolation, socioeconomic disadvantage and an obesogenic food environment in rural areas, as well as severe time and financial constraints for GPs and workforce shortages with a high turnover and lack of accessible allied health professionals. Facilitators included co-located multidisciplinary teams, case management/health coaching, better remuneration for complex consultations involving preventive care and upstream policy measures, such as improving healthy food affordability and availability. Conclusion: Rural patients face systemic, geographic and socioeconomic barriers that are substantially greater than those in urban settings; these barriers impact GPs caring for their patients with chronic disease and cardiometabolic risk factors. Targeted solutions to these barriers such as attention to workforce issues, investment in lifestyle coaching approaches and having dedicated case managers, could reduce rural–urban inequities in chronic disease outcomes.