# The Use of CSF Multiplex PCR Panel in Patients with Viral Uveitis

## TL;DR

This study shows that a CSF-based PCR test can reliably detect herpesviruses in patients with viral uveitis, especially for severe eye infections.

## Contribution

Demonstrates the feasibility of using a CSF multiplex PCR panel for diagnosing viral uveitis in the absence of ophthalmic-specific kits.

## Key findings

- The CSF multiplex PCR panel had a 38.4% overall positivity rate for herpesviruses in uveitis patients.
- The test was most effective for acute retinal necrosis and CMV retinitis, with high positivity rates in these groups.
- CMV was the most common pathogen in anterior uveitis and CMV retinitis, while VZV dominated in acute retinal necrosis.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of ocular fluids is an essential diagnostic method for identifying infectious causes of uveitis. However, multiplex PCR kits specifically developed for ophthalmic use are not commercially available in many regions, including Korea. Given the biochemical similarity between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and aqueous humor, this study evaluated the diagnostic utility of a commercially available CSF multiplex PCR panel for detecting herpesviruses in patients with suspected viral uveitis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients whose aqueous humor samples were analyzed using a multiplex PCR assay originally designed for CSF testing (Seeplex Meningitis-V1 ACE Detection kit, Seegene, Seoul, Republic of Korea). The samples were obtained between May 2019 and June 2023 at two tertiary referral hospitals. The assay targeted herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1, HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6). Patients were classified into three groups: (I) anterior uveitis with suspected herpesviral infection, (II) acute retinal necrosis (ARN), and (III) CMV retinitis. Baseline characteristics, PCR positivity rates, and virus prevalence were compared among the groups. Results: Among 149 eyes tested, 86 were included in the final analysis. The overall positivity rate was 38.4%. PCR positivity was 19.7% (12/61) in Group I, 93.8% (15/16) in Group II, and 66.7% (6/9) in Group III. CMV was the most common pathogen in Groups I (66.7%) and III (100%), while VZV was predominant in Group II (80%). No HHV-6 infection was detected. Conclusions: The positivity rate in anterior uveitis (Group I) was lower than previously reported, likely due to the limited sample volume relative to the assay’s requirement. Nevertheless, the assay demonstrated diagnostic reliability comparable to previous reports for ARN and CMV retinitis. Therefore, the CSF-based multiplex PCR panel serves as a feasible and cost-effective diagnostic option for sight-threatening posterior segment infections, facilitating prompt diagnosis and treatment, although further optimization is warranted for anterior uveitis.