# Ejection Fraction-Related Differences in Left Ventricular and Atrial Strain Indices Among Pediatric Fontan Circulation with Systemic Left Ventricle Morphology

## TL;DR

This study explores how heart function differs in children with Fontan circulation based on ejection fraction and strain measurements.

## Contribution

The study introduces new insights into ventricular and atrial strain indices in pediatric Fontan patients with systemic left ventricle morphology.

## Key findings

- Patients with reduced EF had worse clinical status and higher pulmonary vascular resistance.
- Conventional echocardiographic indices showed limited ability to differentiate between groups.
- LV and atrial strain indices provided complementary information on ventricular-atrial interactions.

## Abstract

Background: Ventricular function assessments in Fontan patients remain challenging. Ejection fraction (EF) lacks sensitivity for early dysfunction, and the roles of strain and advanced imaging in systemic left ventricle (LV) physiology are not fully defined. We aimed to compare (i) LV and atrial strain indices between pediatric Fontan patients with preserved EF (P-LVEF) versus reduced EF (R-LVEF) and (ii) echocardiographic global longitudinal strain, segmental longitudinal strain indices, and conventional 2D and 3D echocardiographic parameters through cardiac morphology. Methods: Pediatric patients with Fontan circulation and systemic LV morphology underwent clinical, hemodynamic, and multimodality echocardiographic evaluation, including 2D/3D parameters, global and segmental LV strain, and left atrial strain. Outcomes were analyzed according to EF status and congenital morphology. Significant results from multiple comparisons were followed by post hoc analysis, where appropriate. Results: Patients with a reduced EF exhibited a worse clinical status, a higher pulmonary vascular resistance index, and greater systemic congestion compared with those with a preserved EF. Conventional 2D indices showed no significant differences between the two studied groups except for LV end-systolic volume (ESV) (p = 0.0315) and LV end-systolic longitudinal diameter (ESL) (p = 0.0024), which showed higher values in the R-LVEF group. Although the relative frequency of impaired deformation was higher in Fontan patients with an unbalanced atrioventricular canal compared with the Fontan patients with a tricuspid atresia + pulmonary stenosis + ventricular septal defect, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1365). Most segmental longitudinal strain values were not significantly different across patients with different cardiac morphology, except for the basal anterior segment and apical inferoseptal segment (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In pediatric Fontan patients with systemic LV morphology, a reduced EF was associated with a worse clinical and hemodynamic status. Conventional echocardiographic indices showed a limited ability to differentiate between the compared groups. Although no statistically significant differences were detected between pediatric Fontan patients with preserved EF and reduced EF, LV and atrial strain indices provided complementary information on ventricular–atrial interactions and myocardial deformation. These findings are exploratory and warrant confirmation in larger, prospective studies.