# Sinus Tarsi Morphometry Is Correlated with Flatfoot Severity on Weight-Bearing CT

## TL;DR

This study shows that the shape of the sinus tarsi is linked to the severity of flatfoot, which could help improve surgical outcomes.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific sinus tarsi morphometric parameters correlated with flatfoot severity using weight-bearing CT.

## Key findings

- Flatfoot cases had significantly greater sinus tarsi length and smaller ST angle compared to controls.
- Smaller ST angle and greater STL/tibia width were correlated with lower Pitch angle in flatfoot.
- ST angle and STL/tibia width may help guide implant selection for subtalar arthroereisis.

## Abstract

Background: Flexible flatfoot is a common musculoskeletal disorder in adolescents, which is characterized by a collapsed longitudinal arch. A common surgery like subtalar arthroereisis depends on the implant in sinus tarsi. Optimal match between them can potentially avoid postoperative pain and obtain improved prognosis. Investigations into anatomical morphology of sinus tarsi by weight-bearing CT (WBCT) may unveil the pathogenesis and facilitate the treatment of flexible flatfoot. Methods: This retrospective study included 28 control cases and 42 flatfoot cases. The sinus tarsi length (STL), the sinus tarsi width (STW), the angle between its long axis and the horizontal line (ST-H angle), the sinus tarsi angle (ST angle), and the tibial width were measured. We also calculated two ratios (STL/tibia width and STW/tibia width) to standardize individual differences. Data analysis was conducted via mean/median comparisons and subsequent linear regression. Results: The STL and the STL/tibia width were significantly greater in the flatfoot group (25.73 ± 3.50 vs. 23.09 ± 3.77 mm, p = 0.004; 0.90 ± 0.15 vs. 0.81 ± 0.14, p = 0.009). The ST angle was significantly smaller in the flatfoot group by an average of 4.63° (13.20° vs. 17.83°, p < 0.001). Linear regression revealed that female gender and smaller ST angle were significantly correlated with higher Meary angle, while smaller ST angle and greater STL/tibia width were significantly correlated with lower Pitch angle (p = 0.002, p = 0.007; p = 0.003, p = 0.004). No statistical predictive effects were observed for the other variables. Conclusions: The ST angle and STL/tibia width may serve as auxiliary parameters for implant selection in subtalar arthroereisis to improve sizing match within the sinus tarsi.