# Effect of the Supine Position and Anesthesia on Nasal Anthropometric Measurements in Rhinoplasty Patients

**Authors:** Mustafa Said Tekin, Ekrem Karaca, Zeynep Bilge Yılmaz Dere, Ali Osman Korkmaz, Yusuf Muhammed Durna, Bahtiyar Hamit, Erkan Soylu

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16010033 · Diagnostics · 2025-12-22

## TL;DR

This study shows that body position and anesthesia change nasal measurements in rhinoplasty patients, which can affect surgical planning and outcomes.

## Contribution

The study quantifies how supine positioning and anesthesia alter nasal anthropometric measurements in rhinoplasty patients.

## Key findings

- The nasion–pronasale distance increased in the preanesthetic supine position compared to upright.
- The nasofrontal angle was higher in the upright position, while nasolabial and nasomental angles increased in the preanesthetic supine position.
- Anesthesia further increased nasal distances but did not change the nasofrontal angle from upright.

## Abstract

Background: Body position and anesthesia may alter nasal anthropometric measurements, potentially affecting both preoperative assessment and intraoperative decisions in rhinoplasty. Quantifying these effects is essential for the accurate evaluation of nasal morphology. Methods: Thirty-five patients (28 females, 7 males; mean age 27.9 ± 6.95 years) undergoing primary rhinoplasty were prospectively included. Standardized lateral photographs were obtained in three conditions: upright, preanesthetic supine, and postanesthetic supine. Linear distances were measured using a digital caliper in a position replicating the photographic setup, and angular parameters were calculated from the photographs using ImageJ software (version 1.53, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Statistical analyses were performed to compare nasal measurements among the three positions. Results: The nasion–pronasale distance increased in the preanesthetic supine compared with the upright position (p < 0.001), while the pronasale–alar curvature distance remained unchanged (p = 0.984). The nasofrontal angle was higher upright (p < 0.001), whereas the nasolabial (p < 0.001) and nasomental (p = 0.010) angles were greater in the preanesthetic supine position. After anesthesia, both nasion–pronasale (p < 0.001) and pronasale–alar curvature (p = 0.001) distances increased further, while the nasofrontal angle remained higher upright (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Supine positioning and anesthesia significantly modify nasal profile parameters. Awareness of these predictable morphologic changes can help surgeons avoid misinterpretation and improve the accuracy of preoperative planning, intraoperative evaluation, and postoperative assessment.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12785270/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12785270/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12785270/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12785270