# Advancing a Hybrid Decision-Making Model in Anesthesiology: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Setting

**Authors:** Gilberto Duarte-Medrano, Natalia Nuño-Lámbarri, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Luigi La Via, Simona Tutino, Guillermo Dominguez-Cherit, Massimiliano Sorbello

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14010097 · Healthcare · 2025-12-31

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how AI is being used alongside human expertise in anesthesiology to improve patient care during surgical procedures.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a hybrid decision-making model that combines AI with clinical judgment in anesthesiology.

## Key findings

- AI supports perioperative risk prediction and enhances anesthetic care through machine learning and big data.
- AI improves procedural accuracy in regional anesthesia and monitoring anesthetic depth via EEG analysis.
- Challenges include algorithmic bias, data security, and the need for clinical validation and ethical oversight.

## Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming anesthesiology practice across perioperative settings. This review explores the evolution and implementation of hybrid decision-making models that integrate AI capabilities with human clinical expertise. From historical foundations to current applications, we examine how machine learning algorithms, deep learning networks, and big data analytics are enhancing anesthetic care. Key applications include perioperative risk prediction, AI-assisted patient education, automated analysis of clinical records, airway management support, predictive hemodynamic monitoring, closed-loop anesthetic delivery systems, and pain management optimization. In procedural contexts, AI demonstrates promising utility in regional anesthesia through anatomical structure identification and needle navigation, monitoring anesthetic depth via EEG analysis, and improving quality control in endoscopic sedation. Educational applications include intelligent simulators for procedural training and academic productivity tools. Despite significant advances, implementation challenges persist, including algorithmic bias, data security concerns, clinical validation requirements, and ethical considerations regarding AI-generated content. The optimal integration model emphasizes a complementary approach where AI augments rather than replaces clinical judgment—combining computational efficiency with the irreplaceable contextual understanding and ethical reasoning of the anesthesiologist. This hybrid paradigm reinforces the anesthesiologist’s leadership role in perioperative care while enhancing safety, precision, and efficiency through technological innovation. As AI integration advances, continued emphasis on algorithmic transparency, rigorous clinical validation, and human oversight remains essential to ensure that these technologies enhance rather than compromise patient-centered anesthetic care.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12785261/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12785261/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12785261/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12785261