Infection with Helicobacter pylori and the age at onset of coeliac disease in the “HUNT4” survey
Kjetil K. Melby, Rebecka Hjort, Knut E. A. Lundin, Eivind Ness-Jensen

TL;DR
This study found that Helicobacter pylori infection and specific antigens may be linked to a later age of coeliac disease diagnosis.
Contribution
The study identifies a potential link between H. pylori antigens and delayed coeliac disease onset.
Findings
H. pylori-positive individuals were diagnosed with coeliac disease at an older age than negative individuals.
Higher antibody levels against GroEL were associated with an older age at sampling in undiagnosed coeliac disease cases.
Antigens like GroEL, gGT, and UreA appeared to contribute to the observed age differences.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether H. pylori or its antigens affect the age at which coeliac disease (CeD) was diagnosed. Participants over 20 years old from the HUNT4 survey were screened for CeD by measuring serum immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G antibodies against transglutaminase-2. H. pylori status was defined by detecting H. pylori-specific immunoglobulin G. H. pylori + participants had a mean age of 62.3 years, compared to 54.8 years for negative participants. In those with previously undiagnosed CeD (n = 43), higher antibody levels against GroEL were associated with an older age at sampling (67.2 years for GroEL-positive vs. 50.8 years for negative). Smaller age differences were noted for gGT (6.0 years), UreA (8.6 years), and HpcC (6.4 years), while vacA and cagA showed only minor differences. Participants with CeD and H. pylori + were older than those who were H.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —University of Oslo (incl Oslo University Hospital)
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCeliac Disease Research and Management · Microscopic Colitis · Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Introduction
Coeliac disease (CeD) is caused by an immune reaction to gluten, a protein in foods containing wheat, barley, or rye. Eating gluten triggers an immune response to the gluten protein in the small intestine. Over time, this reaction damages the small intestine’s lining and prevents it from absorbing nutrients, resulting in malabsorption. The intestinal damage often causes symptoms such as diarrhoea, fatigue, weight loss, bloating, and anaemia. It can lead to serious complications if untreated [1, 2]. There is no definite cure for CeD [1, 2]. For most people, however, following a strict gluten-free diet can help manage symptoms and support the healing of the intestines [1–4]. CeD generally occurs in genetically predisposed individuals, with either tissue type HLA DQ2 or HLA DQ8 [1–4]. These genetic markers typically occur in 30–40% of humans, although only about 2–3% develop the disease in their lifetime [1]. While many individuals with CeD develop the condition before the age of 10 years, it can also manifest later in life [1].
General laboratory manuals [5] describe various methods for detecting H. pylori. For large-scale epidemiological studies, the detection of specific H. pylori antibodies (typically IgG) may be suitable for identifying individuals with prior exposure.
Additionally, interactions between H. pylori and CeD have been documented [2–4]. As reports have indicated that H. pylori infection is inversely associated with allergic and autoimmune diseases [6–8], we previously conducted a small study that suggested that carrying H. pylori cagA+(cytotoxin-associated antigen A) strains may be linked to a delayed onset of CeD [9]. Thus, individuals harbouring H. pylori cagA + strains were older than those who were H. pylori negative [9]. The present study aimed to determine whether H. pylori or its antigens affected the age at which CeD was diagnosed.
Materials and methods
Cases were obtained from the population-based HUNT4 survey in which all participants over 20 years of age were screened for possible CeD by measuring serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against transglutaminase-2, as previously described [2–4]. Participants who tested positive for these serum markers of CeD (n = 1,107, denoted sCeD), of whom 53.1% were women, were invited to undergo an endoscopy. This procedure included histopathological examination of biopsies from the duodenum and testing for H. pylori infection in the stomach using a specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of the 657 cases, only 48 were H. pylori positive.
In the present study, H. pylori infection was initially determined using IgG H. pylori serology (LIAISON^®^ H. pylori IgG Diasorin, Italy). The presence of H. pylori-specific IgG antibodies indicates presence of H. pylori if not given antibiotic treatment directed against H. pylori [5]. Subsequently, SeraSpot^®^ Anti-Helicobacter-6 IgG (Seramun Diagnostica GmbH, Germany) was applied for the detection of specific IgG antibodies against H. pylori antigens: cagA(cytotoxin-associated antigen A), gGT (a highly conserved virulence factor present in all Hp strains), GroEL (chaperonin – Heat shock protein 60), HpcC (Helicobacter cysteine-rich protein C), UreA (urease subunit A - a virulence factor), and vacA (vacuolising toxin). Only sera that provided a positive or borderline result in the primary test were subject to further analysis. In this specific antigen assay, six highly immunogenic H. pylori antigens were applied. Antigens in SeraSpot^®^ Anti-Helicobacter-6 IgG/IgA are based on recombinant proteins. These were expressed in and purified from Escherichia coli and spot-immobilised in wells of microtiter plates to detect serological immune responses in patient sera. Some strains produce toxins such as VacA and CagA [5, 10–14]. Studies have identified HcpC and GroEL as virulence factors, with GroEL potentially being more important than HcpC [11]. For the development of the spot immunoassay, six different H. pylori proteins were considered: CagA (P80200), VacA (Q48247), GroEL (P42383), UreA (P14916), gGT (O25743), and HcpC (O25728). The selection was based on antigen properties such as virulence factors (CagA, VacA, GroEL, UreA), immune evasion factors (gGT and VacA) [5, 10–14], and surface-localised or secreted H. pylori proteins (HcpC) epidemiologically linked to gastric cancer [11]. The tests for specific IgG antibodies in this test system were run according to the instruction manual provided by the producer [15].
Results
Of the 1,107 individuals with positive sCeD, 958 participated in this study: 526 women (mean age 54.8 years) and 432 men (mean age 56.8 years). Of these, 952 had sera for anti-Hp-IgG testing, with 131 positives for IgG against H. pylori, 49 borderline, and 772 negatives. Results are given in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1. Sera from the HUNT4 survey were tested for the presence of IgG anti-*H. pylori *antibodiesRelation to CeD (HUNT4)H. pylori serologyUCeDKnCeDUnclassifiedTotalFemale35436198588 Borderline731121 Insufficient volume2––2 Negative26231144437 Positive2424066 No serum59–362Male31123185519 Borderline1411328 Insufficient volume2–24 Negative19413128335 Positive1983865 No serum821487Total665593831107The samples were further categorised based on the information available at the time of serum collection into the following groups: UCeD: Unknown CeD; KnCeD: Known CeD; Unclassified (i.e. neither UCeD nor KnCeD): no classification available. All serum samples exhibited elevated antibody levels consistent with coeliac disease (sCeD), as detailed in the materials and methods section
Table 2. Mean age of participants with previously unrecognised coeliac disease (sCeD) (n = 520, of which data from 499 were available), based on the criteria given in materials and MethodsStatusTotalRecently diagnosed CeD by serology (sCeD)Hp negativeHp positiveMean age52.158.2No. of cases45643499Participants were further categorised by H. pylori (Hp) serology as carriers (positive) or non-carriers (negative)
Excluding known CeD (n = 64), non-CeD (n = 322), and lack of biopsy (n = 7) in individuals who were sCeD positive, a provisional potential or definite CeD diagnosis was reached in 559 cases, of which 351 had confirmed CeD. Of these, 26 (7.4%) were H. pylori positive and 13 (3.7%) had borderline results.
Individuals with sCeD who tested negative for H. pylori had a mean age of 54,8 years, while those who tested positive had a mean age of 62,3 years.
Among 59 individuals with known CeD, 10 tested positive for H. pylori, four had borderline results, and one lacked a serum sample.
Analysis was performed on IgG antibodies against specific H. pylori antigens in individuals who were H. pylori+ (n = 43) with previously unrecognised sCeD (Table 2).
These individuals with sCeD and anti-GroEL IgG antibodies were, on average, 16.4 years older at serum sampling than those without these antibodies. Similar age trends were observed with other antigens (gGT: 6 years; UreA: 9 years; HpcC: 7 years). Smaller age differences were noted for vacA and cagA. In the borderline group (data not shown), the presence of cagA antibodies mirrored GroEL’s effects. The results are presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Mean age of participants with previously unrecognised coeliac disease (sCeD) (n = 43), being H. pylori seropositive. Participants were further categorised by the presence or absence of IgG antibodies to various H. pylori antigensH. pylori antigenscagA n gGT n groEL n UreA n vacA n HcP n Mean agePositive61.21762.32367.22665.21460.5264.311Negative57.62656.32050.81756.62957.84157.132All were individuals with previously undiagnosed sCeD and carriers of H. pylori (see Table 2). n = number of individuals with either positive or negative tests
H. pylori infection may prompt antibody production detectable in serum [23]. IgG levels against transglutaminase-2 were, however, found comparable: H. pylori + group, 32.0 mg/l; and H. pylori − group, 32.9 mg/l.
Comments and conclusion
Our study revealed that antigens from H. pylori, such as GroEL, gGT, UreA, and possibly both vacA and cagA, may affect the symptomatic expression of CeD. We believe, however, that our observations and suggestions should be seen in conjunction with the declining carriage rate of H. pylori in Western countries [24].
In 2013, Lebwohl and Blaser et al. [6] reported, in contrast to Crabtree et al. [16], an inverse association between the presence of H. pylori and CeD, which persisted even after adjusting for socioeconomic factors. They suggested that future studies should explore whether H. pylori modulates immune responses to gluten in individuals with CeD [6]. Since then, several studies have presented conflicting results [17–19]. In 2022, Yu et al. [20] presented a comprehensive meta-analysis, confirming an inverse correlation between CeD and the presence of H. pylori; however, they were unable to establish causality but referred to publications suggesting an influence of H. pylori on Treg lymphocytes [21–23]. The authors recommended that prospective studies should address this topic and further investigate gut microbiota and immune imbalance as potential mechanisms for disease progression in CeD [20]. H. pylori infection may ameliorate the severity of CeD in children [7]. In contrast, however, the aforementioned meta-analysis suggests that H. pylori may increase the severity of abdominal symptoms from CeD [20].
Moreover, H. pylori infection is characterised primarily by intense gastritis at the beginning, which then decreases in intensity and may remain stable for years. In some individuals (10–15%), it can lead to peptic ulcer disease in the duodenum or stomach [24], while in others (< 1%), it may lead to stomach cancer [11, 25]. Mucosa-associated lymphoma, i.e., MALT lymphoma in the stomach, has also been linked to H. pylori infection (< 0.1%) [26]. In children, the infection prompts the immune system to produce antibodies that can be detected in the serum, showing low serum IgG antibodies against transglutaminase-2 [27]. In our cohort, no such extra effect of H. pylori infection was observed. Reports suggest, however, that H. pylori may inhibit the immune response to gliadin [8].
Furthermore, there are several virulence factors in H. pylori. Thus, the Anti-Helicobacter-6 IgG, which is an in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative determination of antibodies of the IgG isotype against H. pylori-specific antigens in serum, should catch such specific antibodies. These extracellular products contribute to pathogenesis by causing direct damage to the stomach epithelium, leading to chronic inflammation with increased levels of inflammatory agents such as interleukin 8, interleukin 1, or tumour necrosis alpha factor [10, 11, 24].
Additionally, several extraintestinal manifestations of H. pylori infection have been proposed and partially documented [24, 30]. The importance of autoantibodies in the development of atrophic gastritis, a precursor to stomach cancer, has been discussed [11]. A study using H. pylori multiplex serology [11] identified antibodies to HcpC and GroEL as independent virulence factors that, in combination with the established markers anti-CagA and anti-VacA, were highly predictive of chronic atrophic gastritis risk [11]. In a population-based cancer case-control study, antibodies to a multitude of H. pylori proteins were associated with stomach cancer [11]. In the present study, this technology [11–14] was applied to sera from individuals with CeD who were serologically defined as having H. pylori infection by the primary test (LIAISON).
Furthermore, H. pylori may affect the regulatory immune cells (Tregs). The Treg naïve (Tregn), which are primarily primed in the thymus, prevents attacks on self-antigens. The large group named TregE, derived from naïve CD4 T cells, is destined to identify bacterial and viral antigens as potential threats to the individual and thus to destroy them [28, 29]. The Treg response caused by H. pylori can change the immune response and may modulate autoimmune reactions [24]. Thus, an overview of H. pylori [24] summarises the recruitment of T1 cells to the human gastric mucosa, including Th1, Th17, and Treg cells. While animal models for CeD studies exist, there are no animal studies on the potential protective effects of H. pylori [8, 18]. Research in a mouse model, however, indicated that infection with H. pylori in infant mice reduces the incidence of allergies in adult mice. This effect did not occur, however, if the H. pylori infection was contracted in adult mice [30]. Interestingly, a potential protective effect against asthmatic disease was observed in a cohort of children, possibly linked to early-life H. pylori infection, as asthmatic disease was not observed at the age of 16 in children who were H. pylori + by the age of 2. At the age of 2 years, the prevalence of H. pylori carriage was approximately 6% [31]. Thus, if H. pylori is contracted during early childhood, the clinical symptoms of related conditions, such as CeD, may be delayed. Consequently, a reduction in H. pylori carriage from childhood could lead to an increase in the number of clinically overt cases of CeD.
Internationally published data indicate a global H.pylori carriage rate of 56.1% (ranging from 49.4% to 62.9%), while in Europe, the rate stands at 47.5% (ranging from 43.0% to 52.1%) for the corresponding age group [32]. In the current study based on the HUNT4 survey, a large number of individuals were included, revealing in contrast an average H. pylori carriage rate of approximately 18% [2–4]. Some of these individuals may have contracted the infection during childhood. In our subset of participants who tested positive for CeD by serology, 2.4% of those under 30 years old were H. pylori carriers. In contrast, 12.1% of participants over 60 years old were carriers.
This study has limitations, primarily due to the low carriage rate of H. pylori. As a result, there are only a few cases in each study group, leading to insufficient data for statistical analysis, which ultimately prevents us from drawing statistically significant conclusions. Moreover, PCR detection of H. pylori was performed, revealing fewer positive cases compared to serology. The observed trends were similar, but the number of positive cases was lower than those of H. pylori serology. Furthermore, complications arise when commenting on results from other studies due to the use of different methods to determine H. pylori status and inconsistency in controlling for age, sex, and socioeconomic status [8]. This limitation is important, as CeD may be more common in women and people with higher socioeconomic status, while H. pylori is more common in the opposite groups [20]. In addition, individuals infected with H. pylori may experience abdominal pain and other gastrointestinal issues that can mask symptoms of CeD, resulting in a delayed diagnosis. H. pylori infection can also influence the antigenicity of gliadin due to the effects of stomach acid [1, 8].
This study found that those who have CeD and are infected with H. pylori, tend to be older than similar individuals who are H. pylori−. As the prevalence of H. pylori in the community gradually decreases, a cohort effect should be considered to explain the mean age differences. Interestingly, antigens such as GroEL, gGT, UreA, and possibly both vacA and cagA from H. pylori or other bacteria with similar antigens [33, 34] may affect the expression of CeD, potentially delaying the clinical diagnosis of CeD if infected with H. pylori early in life. At present, studies have addressed the role of subsets of T cells for inflammation in CeD [35]. Furthermore, Catassi et al. [36] reported a lowered number of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium and an increase in Bacteroides and E. coli in individuals with CeD. However, based on evidence from a Mendelian randomised study [37], a causal relationship between H. pylori and CeD has not been established. Further studies are therefore warranted, comparing the microbiome of healthy individuals compared with that of individuals with CeD, while considering the hygiene hypothesis [38].
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Instructions for use Sera Spot Anti-Helicobacter. – 6 Ig G https://www.seramun.com/en/products/spot-kits/infectious-diseases.html
