# Cemiplimab in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

## TL;DR

The study evaluated cemiplimab's safety and effectiveness in Japanese patients with advanced lung cancer, finding it effective with a favorable risk profile.

## Contribution

This study provides new evidence on the efficacy and safety of cemiplimab in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

## Key findings

- Cemiplimab monotherapy achieved a 60% objective response rate in PD-L1 ≥50% patients.
- Cemiplimab combined with chemotherapy showed a 42% response rate regardless of PD-L1 levels.
- Treatment-related adverse events occurred in over 50% of patients but were consistent with known safety profiles.

## Abstract

EMPOWER-Lung 1 and EMPOWER-Lung 3 (phase 3 studies) demonstrated survival benefits for cemiplimab with/without chemotherapy in global (non-Japanese) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). This single-arm dose-expansion study assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of first-line cemiplimab (350 mg intravenous every 3 weeks) as monotherapy/with chemotherapy in Japanese patients with aNSCLC.

The primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of cemiplimab as monotherapy/with chemotherapy. Secondary objectives included immunogenicity, tumor response (objective response rate [ORR], and duration of response [DOR]). Patients whose tumors expressed programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥50% on tumor cells received cemiplimab monotherapy (Cohort A; n = 60, safety; n = 50, efficacy). Patients whose tumors expressed any level of PD-L1 received cemiplimab plus four cycles of chemotherapy (Cohort C; n = 50).

Safety results were generally consistent with the known safety profile of cemiplimab. Treatment-emergent adverse events (grade ≥3) were experienced by 51.7% (31/60) in patients receiving cemiplimab monotherapy (Cohort A) and 68.0% (34/50) in those receiving cemiplimab + chemotherapy (Cohort C). Pharmacokinetic results were similar across both cohorts. In Cohort A patients with centrally confirmed PD-L1 ≥50%, ORR was 60.0% (30/50) with an observed DOR of 2.1–42.5 months. In Cohort C, ORR was 42.0% (21/50) with an observed DOR of 2.3–20.7 months. Immunogenicity was low in both cohorts.

Cemiplimab demonstrated efficacy in Japanese patients as monotherapy for PD-L1 ≥50% and with chemotherapy irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Overall, cemiplimab demonstrated a favorable benefit–risk profile in Japanese patients.

Cemiplimab demonstrated efficacy in Japanese patients as monotherapy for PD-L1 ≥50% and with chemotherapy irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Overall, cemiplimab demonstrated a favorable benefit–risk profile in Japanese patients.