# Synthesis of Polymers From Bio‐Based Methacrylates Comprising Aromatic or Aliphatic Structures Using NIR‐Mediated ATRP

**Authors:** Nicolai Meckbach, Lea Viktoria Rubbert, Bernd Strehmel, Veronika Strehmel

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/marc.202500718 · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · 2025-11-09

## TL;DR

This paper explores the synthesis of polymers from bio-based methacrylates using a specific light-mediated method and compares their properties to traditional polymers.

## Contribution

The study introduces the use of near-infrared mediated ATRP for synthesizing polymers from novel bio-based methacrylates.

## Key findings

- Bio-based polymethacrylates show broader dispersity compared to poly(methyl methacrylate).
- Block copolymers from bio-based methacrylates exhibit distinct solubility due to structural differences.
- Initiation efficiency is lower for the isomer mixture of one bio-based methacrylate compared to methyl methacrylate.

## Abstract

NIR‐mediated ATRP is used for the synthesis of polymethacrylates from the bio‐based monomers 4‐(4‐methacryloyloxyphenyl)butan‐2‐one and methyl 9‐hydroxy‐10‐(methacryloyloxy) octadecanoate / methyl 9‐(methacryloyloxy)‐10‐hydroxy octadecanoate. According to the NIR‐mediated ATRP protocol, excitation is carried out at 790 nm in the presence of copper(II)bromide tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine complex as deactivator and a heptamethine cyanine comprising a barbiturate group in the meso‐position operating as sensitizer. The homopolymers obtained are compared with similarly made poly(methyl methacrylate) regarding yield, molecular weight, dispersity, and glass transition temperature. Furthermore, block copolymers made from methyl methacrylate and the bio‐based monomers are included in this comparison. Dispersity is broader in the case of the bio‐based polymethacrylates compared to poly(methyl methacrylate), indicating a higher contribution of chain termination during NIR‐mediated ATRP using the bio‐based methacrylates. Notably, all macroinitiators are chain extendable. In addition, the block copolymers synthesized from the bio‐based methacrylates significantly differ regarding their solubility, that is caused by the distinct structural features in the ester part of these monomers. Results obtained from GPC investigation of tetrahydrofuran soluble copolymers are included in the discussion. These results show that the initiation efficiency is lower for the methyl 9‐hydroxy‐10‐(methacryloyloxy) octadecanoate / methyl 9‐(methacryloyloxy)‐10‐hydroxy octadecanoate isomer mixture compared to methyl methacrylate.

Two bio‐based methacrylates (4‐(4‐methacryloyloxyphenyl)butan‐2‐one and methyl 9‐hydroxy‐10‐(methacryloyloxy) octadecanoate / methyl 9‐(methacryloyloxy)‐10‐hydroxy octadecanoate isomer mixture) are investigated in Photo‐ATRP to obtain homopolymers and block copolymers. The commercially available methyl methacrylate is selected for comparison of homopolymer and copolymer synthesis regarding yield, molecular weight and dispersity in case of tetrahydrofurane soluble polymers, and glass transition temperature.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** barbiturate (PubChem CID 6211), methyl methacrylate (PubChem CID 6658), tetrahydrofuran (PubChem CID 8028)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** methyl methacrylate (MESH:D020366), Methacrylates (MESH:D008689), poly(methyl methacrylate) (MESH:D019904), ester (MESH:D004952), Polymers (MESH:D011108), 4-(4-methacryloyloxyphenyl)butan-2-one (-), tetrahydrofuran (MESH:C018674), barbiturate (MESH:C032232), polymethacrylates (MESH:C030613)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12784184/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12784184/full.md

## References

66 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12784184/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12784184