# Novel Echocardiographic Index for Risk Stratification of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Mortality Based on Right Ventricular Function

**Authors:** Toshinori Chiba, Takatsugu Kajiyama, Yusuke Kondo, Hiroyuki Takaoka, Noriko Suzuki‐Eguchi, Masahiro Nakano, Miyo Nakano, Satoko Ryuzaki, Yukiko Takanashi, Yuya Komai, Yusei Nishikawa, Yoshio Kobayashi

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70244 · Journal of Arrhythmia · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This study introduces a new echocardiographic index, CPI, to better predict the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in patients undergoing ICD implantation.

## Contribution

The novel contraction pressure index (CPI) is proposed as a superior risk stratification tool for ICD therapy and mortality prediction.

## Key findings

- CPI demonstrated higher prognostic performance compared to RVFAC and RVEF.
- A CPI cut-off of 1.59 showed high sensitivity for predicting the composite endpoint of death and appropriate ICD therapy.
- Both CPI and RVEF were effective in predicting appropriate ICD therapy and mortality.

## Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is independently predictive of sudden cardiac death. This study aimed to compare the performance of different risk stratification methods for death and appropriate implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) therapy using echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to quantify RV function.

Consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantations who had completed both preprocedural echocardiography and CMR were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with channelopathies or arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease were excluded. The RV fractional area change (RVFAC) and estimated pulmonary artery pressure (EPAP) were calculated from echocardiography. The contraction pressure index (CPI) was defined as the quotient of the RVFAC divided by the EPAP. Both metrics were used to predict the composite endpoint of death and an appropriate ICD therapy. RV dysfunction was defined by either RVFAC < 35% or RV ejection fraction (RVEF) < 45%.

In total, 88 patients (60.4 ± 14.7 years, 61 males) including 15 with ischemic cardiomyopathy were retrospectively enrolled. Forty‐two patients received ICDs as secondary prevention. The mean RVFAC, CPI, and RVEF were 35.9% ± 9.22%, 1.4% ± 0.7%/mmHg, and 39.5% ± 14.4%, respectively. Regarding the composite endpoint, the best cut‐off value of the CPI was 1.59 (specificity 0.45, sensitivity 0.96, ROC‐AUC 0.68). The hazard ratio of a low RVFAC was 3.28 (95% CI: 1.39–7.77, p = 0.007, concordance = 0.622), a low CPI, 14.2 (95% CI: 1.91–104.9, p = 0.010, c = 0.665), and a low RVEF, 3.44 (95% CI: 1.17–10.1, p = 0.003, c = 0.620).

Both CMR‐derived RVEF and the echocardiographic CPI predicted appropriate ICD therapy and death. The CPI may provide superior risk stratification.

Patients undergoing ICD implantation with both preprocedural echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) were retrospectively analyzed to assess right ventricular (RV) function. Echocardiographic RV fractional area change (RVFAC) and the contraction pressure index (CPI), as well as CMR‐derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF), predicted appropriate ICD therapy and death, with CPI demonstrating superior prognostic performance.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** sudden cardiac death (MONDO:0007264)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** sudden cardiac death (MESH:D016757), channelopathies (MESH:D053447), death (MESH:D003643), arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease (MESH:D019571), ischemic cardiomyopathy (MESH:D009202), RV dysfunction (MESH:D018497), Ventricular Arrhythmias (MESH:D001145)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783901/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783901/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783901/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783901