# Why Feminist Participatory Methods Matter for Global Health Research in Sub‐Saharan Africa

**Authors:** Heather M. Tucker, Don Catherine Awuor Ochieng

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202500066 · Global Challenges · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This paper discusses how feminist research methods can address power imbalances in global health research in Sub-Saharan Africa.

## Contribution

The paper introduces feminist and participatory methods as tools to challenge power dynamics in global health research partnerships in Sub-Saharan Africa.

## Key findings

- Feminist participatory methods can disrupt traditional research relationships and assumptions in global health.
- These methods are rooted in the lived experiences of health disparities in formerly colonized contexts.
- They offer localized solutions to complex health inequities in Sub-Saharan Africa.

## Abstract

Research in global health is often framed as centering health equity. However, research and programmatic partnerships are often relationships between institutions and researchers in high‐income countries (HICs), and researchers and actors in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), including many countries in Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA). Such relationships are rife with power dynamics that require thoughtful attention and solutions. Feminist research methods, including perspectives from intersectional and African feminist thinkers, as well as participatory approaches, may offer a means of engaging with power inequities and disrupting often taken‐for‐granted assumptions in the SSA context. Such epistemological perspectives and methods not only disrupt “traditional” research relationships and challenge unexamined assumptions about knowledge but are also driven by the lived experiences of health disparities in specific, formerly colonized contexts and can therefore lead to context‐specific or localized solutions to complex health inequities. This paper explores how these specific feminist research perspectives and methods can challenge power dynamics that are often embedded in global health research and interventions in SSA.

Research in global health is often framed as centering health equity. Research and programmatic partnerships are often relationships that are rife with power inequities. Feminist research methods, including perspectives from intersectional and African feminist thinkers, as well as participatory approaches, may offer a means of engaging with power inequities and disrupting global health inequities that are common in the sub‐Saharan African context, specifically.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** health (OMIM:603663), diseased (MESH:D004194), traumatized (MESH:D014947)
- **Chemicals:** PrEP (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (no rank) [taxon 11676]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783689/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783689/full.md

## References

49 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783689/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783689