# Healthy human gut microbiome: Towards standardized research

**Authors:** Evgeniya Glazunova, Polina Molodtsova, Ilya Grabarnik, Alexander Kurnosov, Irina Bikaeva, German Shipulin, Olga Zlobovskaya

PMC · DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2025034 · AIMS Microbiology · 2025-11-04

## TL;DR

This study reviews gut microbiome research to establish standardized methods for comparing healthy human gut flora across studies.

## Contribution

The paper proposes methodological standardization for 16S rRNA sequencing to improve consistency in gut microbiome research.

## Key findings

- No significant association was found between sample preparation or cohort location and phyla composition after excluding large cohorts.
- Bacillota and Bacteroidota were the most abundant phyla in healthy gut microbiomes.
- The study highlights the need for standardized protocols in microbiome research to ensure reliable comparisons.

## Abstract

An increasing number of international researchers are focusing on the taxonomic composition of fecal microbiota and its correlation with disorders. Thousands of researchers compare conditionally healthy cohorts to those with specific diseases to identify potential markers. However, clinical application requires assessing the feasibility of synthesizing these findings and establishing reference intervals for normal gut flora, at least at higher taxonomic levels.

This study involves a systematic review and meta-analysis of human gut microbiota research based on 16S rRNA gene next-generation sequencing (NGS). Relevant research was sourced following the PRISMA guidelines. Descriptive statistics, linear regression analysis by weighted least squares method, Mann-Whitney test, and Benjamini-Hochberg procedure adjustments were employed. The study has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023431467).

Of the 4,346 studies initially identified, 86 publications involving 20,748 unique participants met the quality criteria and were included in the analysis of the impact of fecal sample preparation on taxonomic composition. The phylotype composition, in relation to preprocessing methods and cohort locations, are presented as relative abundances (%): Bacillota (median 49.5–59.6%), Bacteroidota (28.0–33.4%), Pseudomonadota (3.4–5.9%), Actinomycetota (2.3–3.7%), Verrucomicrobiota (0.5–1.0%), Fusobacteriota (maximum 4.6%), and Euryarchaeota (maximum 2.11%). The content of 27 key family-level representatives was also evaluated. The well-known hypothesis regarding the influence of the homogenization stage on taxonomic composition was examined using generalized results.

While supported by a strong theoretical basis and evidence from individual practical cases, none of the phyla showed a statistically significant association and consistent relationship with sample preparation or cohort location when generalizing across studies after the two exceptionally large cohorts exclusion, both originating from a single research group. These findings underscore the need for strict methodological standardization in microbiome studies. Key features of the 16S NGS process accounting for these results are outlined, along with proposed optimizations for microbiome research.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** 16S rRNA (16S ribosomal RNA) [NCBI Gene 2597965]

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** gut metagenome (species) [taxon 749906], Verrucomicrobiota (phylum) [taxon 74201], Fusobacteriota (phylum) [taxon 32066], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783075/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783075/full.md

## References

135 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783075/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12783075