# Practicing community-based research in GIScience and geography – a case study with an Indigenous community, best practices, challenges, and lessons learned

**Authors:** Yan Lin, Daniel Beene, Theodros Woldeyohannes, Zhuoming Liu, William Tatman, Andee Lister, Xi Gong, Miriam Gay-Antaki, Jani Ingram, Joseph Hoover

PMC · DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2025.2540843 · Cartography and geographic information science · 2026-01-09

## TL;DR

This paper discusses community-based research in GIScience and geography, focusing on a case study with an Indigenous community to address environmental health issues from mining.

## Contribution

The paper presents a case study and best practices for community-based research in GIScience, emphasizing co-produced knowledge and collaboration with Indigenous communities.

## Key findings

- Community-based research in GIScience can center local voices and knowledge systems.
- Collaborations with Indigenous communities can lead to meaningful outcomes through co-produced knowledge.
- Best practices for CBR include reciprocity, respect, and ensuring tangible benefits for communities.

## Abstract

Community-based research (CBR) in geography is increasingly emphasizing participatory approaches that center the voices of local communities in the research process. This shift seeks to move away from extractive research practices by fostering collaborations built on reciprocity and respect – particularly with Indigenous and marginalized groups. At the core of this approach is co-produced knowledge, wherein communities actively shape research priorities, methodologies, and interpretations. Rather than imposing external frameworks, these collaborations recognize the value of local and Indigenous knowledge systems in informing research and driving meaningful outcomes. In this paper, we review contemporary CBR literature in geography and GIScience and present a case study on environmental health concerns related to mining legacies in the U.S. This research, led by GIScience and geospatial experts in collaboration with a Tribal community, illustrates opportunities to advance CBR theory and practice within these fields. As CBR becomes increasingly integrated into GIScience projects, we critically examine the positionality of GIScience researchers in this transition, the challenges they face, and the lessons learned. The paper closes with a discussion of best practices for CBR. While all research involves some degree of extractivism, we explore how CBR can help ensure that communities derive direct and tangible benefits from participation in GIScience and geography research.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** lung cancer (MESH:D008175), cardiovascular disease (MESH:D002318), preterm birth (MESH:D047928), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Chemicals:** AUM (-), arsenic (MESH:D001151), vanadium (MESH:D014639), Uranium (MESH:D014501), heavy metals (MESH:D019216)
- **Species:** Capra hircus (domestic goat, species) [taxon 9925], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Ovis aries (domestic sheep, species) [taxon 9940]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12782218/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12782218/full.md

## References

68 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12782218/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12782218